These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

263 related items for PubMed ID: 10272361

  • 1. Ohio court upholds merger, finds bidding plan illegal.
    Baker C.
    Health Law Vigil; 1985 Jun 14; 8(12):5-7. PubMed ID: 10272361
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Competitive bidding: they're singing the blues in Cleveland.
    Onusko TJ.
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1986 Feb 14; 40(2):64-8. PubMed ID: 10275007
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Legal challenges test relationships between Ohio hospitals, Blues plans.
    Richman D.
    Mod Healthc; 1986 Jul 04; 16(14):74. PubMed ID: 10277194
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Court upholds Blues' fee discounts.
    Burda D.
    Mod Healthc; 1989 Sep 01; 19(35):3. PubMed ID: 10324683
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Minimizing antitrust risks of Blue Cross and Blue Shield plans.
    Steele CJ.
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1988 Sep 01; 4():227-72. PubMed ID: 10288422
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Providers must scrutinize contracts, bargain to eliminate unfavorable terms.
    Hickey K, O'Gara N.
    Mod Healthc; 1986 Mar 28; 16(7):151-2. PubMed ID: 10275673
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. St. Francis Hospital takes on the Blues.
    Haradine J.
    Mich Hosp; 1978 Mar 28; 14(3):21-2. PubMed ID: 10306418
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Recoupment: fear, confusion, and a court date.
    Jones DB.
    Tex Med; 1987 Dec 28; 83(12):47-9. PubMed ID: 3321522
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Plan contracts with providers: cost containment objectives amid conflicting legislative schemes.
    Heitler G, Ader M.
    J Leg Med; 1981 Sep 28; 2(3):265-96. PubMed ID: 6976401
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Vertical restraints among hospitals, physicians and health insurers that raise rivals' costs. A case study of Reazin v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc. and Ocean State Physicians Health Plan, Inc. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Rhode Island.
    Baker JB.
    Am J Law Med; 1988 Sep 28; 14(2-3):147-69. PubMed ID: 3245541
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Michigan law treats Blues plan like public agency, not private institution.
    LaViolette S.
    Mod Healthc; 1981 Mar 28; 11(3):34, 36. PubMed ID: 10250327
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Court decisions give Blues plans one win, one loss in separate antitrust cases.
    Halper HR, Kazon PM.
    Bus Health; 1987 Mar 28; 4(5):51-2. PubMed ID: 10280673
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Some aspects of PA 350 will affect physician practice.
    Ford MA, Zannoth D.
    Mich Med; 1986 Mar 28; 85(3):104, 114. PubMed ID: 3959918
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Court upholds hospitals' suit against Blue Cross.
    Am Med News; 1979 Jul 06; 22(27):8. PubMed ID: 10242755
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The Insurance Bureau, the Blues and the prospective reimbursement system.
    Cohn A.
    Mich Hosp; 1978 Aug 06; 14(8):8-11. PubMed ID: 10308444
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Medicare recoupment of alleged "overpayments".
    Wilcox DP.
    Tex Med; 1987 Dec 06; 83(12):51-3. PubMed ID: 3321523
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.