These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

277 related items for PubMed ID: 10315706

  • 1. An evaluation of the P.K. Morgan pocket spirometer.
    Hess D, Lehman E, Troup J, Smoker J.
    Respir Care; 1986 Sep; 31(9):786-91. PubMed ID: 10315706
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Evaluation of the turbine pocket spirometer.
    Gunawardena KA, Houston K, Smith AP.
    Thorax; 1987 Sep; 42(9):689-93. PubMed ID: 3686460
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Evaluation of the Cavitron Spirometric Computer for accuracy in clinical screening spirometry.
    Cissik JH, Cramer TJ, Shelman LL.
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1981 Feb; 52(2):125-9. PubMed ID: 7213297
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of a new desktop spirometer (Spirospec) with a laboratory spirometer in a respiratory out-patient clinic.
    Swart F, Schuurmans MM, Heydenreich JC, Pieper CH, Bolliger CT.
    Respir Care; 2003 Jun; 48(6):591-5. PubMed ID: 12780945
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Accuracy and repeatability of a pocket turbine spirometer: comparison with a rolling seal flow-volume spirometer.
    Malmberg LP, Hedman J, Sovijärvi AR.
    Clin Physiol; 1993 Jan; 13(1):89-98. PubMed ID: 8435980
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Measurement of FEV1 and FVC. Comparison of a pocket spirometer with the Vitalograph.
    Hosie HE, Nimmo WS.
    Anaesthesia; 1988 Mar; 43(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 3364644
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Evaluation of a new electronic spirometer: the vitalograph "Escort" spirometer.
    Wiltshire N, Kendrick AH.
    Thorax; 1994 Feb; 49(2):175-8. PubMed ID: 8128409
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The utility of hand-held mobile spirometer technology in a resource-constrained setting.
    Du Plessis E, Swart F, Maree D, Heydenreich J, Van Heerden J, Esterhuizen TM, Irusen EM, Koegelenberg CFN.
    S Afr Med J; 2019 Mar 29; 109(4):219-222. PubMed ID: 31084684
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A comparison of a new transtelephonic portable spirometer with a laboratory spirometer.
    Izbicki G, Abboud S, Jordan P, Perruchoud AP, Bolliger CT.
    Eur Respir J; 1999 Jul 29; 14(1):209-13. PubMed ID: 10489853
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Clinical comparison of two electronic spirometers with a water-sealed spirometer.
    Shanks DE, Morris JF.
    Chest; 1976 Apr 29; 69(4):461-6. PubMed ID: 1261311
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Validation of the portable Air-Smart Spirometer.
    Ramos Hernández C, Núñez Fernández M, Pallares Sanmartín A, Mouronte Roibas C, Cerdeira Domínguez L, Botana Rial MI, Blanco Cid N, Fernández Villar A.
    PLoS One; 2018 Apr 29; 13(2):e0192789. PubMed ID: 29474502
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The Spirostat: comparison with water-sealed spirometer.
    Gold MI, Feldman I, Hebel JR.
    Crit Care Med; 1975 Apr 29; 3(4):155-8. PubMed ID: 1192752
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The accuracy of a handheld portable spirometer.
    Rebuck DA, Hanania NA, D'Urzo AD, Chapman KR.
    Chest; 1996 Jan 29; 109(1):152-7. PubMed ID: 8549178
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of a portable, pneumotach flow-sensor-based spirometer (Spirofy™) with the vitalograph alpha Touch™ spirometer in evaluating lung function in healthy individuals, asthmatics, and COPD patients-a randomized, crossover study.
    Talwar D, Balamurugan S, Modi M, Salvi S, Lopez M, Shah R, Vaidya A, Barne M, Madas S, Kulkarni N, Sawant S, Gogtay J.
    BMC Pulm Med; 2024 May 10; 24(1):230. PubMed ID: 38730359
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Agreement between spirometers: a challenge in the follow-up of patients and populations?
    Gerbase MW, Dupuis-Lozeron E, Schindler C, Keidel D, Bridevaux PO, Kriemler S, Probst-Hensch NM, Rochat T, Künzli N.
    Respiration; 2013 May 10; 85(6):505-14. PubMed ID: 23485575
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Clinical evaluation of five spirometers. Monaghan M403, Pneumoscreen, Spirotron, Vicatest and Vitalograph.
    Wever AM, Britton MG, Hughes DT, Van der Plas KH, Wever-Hess J.
    Eur J Respir Dis; 1981 May 10; 62(2):127-37. PubMed ID: 7238663
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Evaluation of a new ambulatory spirometer for measuring forced expiratory volume in one second and peak expiratory flow rate.
    Johns DP, Abramson M, Bowes G.
    Am Rev Respir Dis; 1993 May 10; 147(5):1245-50. PubMed ID: 8484638
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.