These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
215 related items for PubMed ID: 10317637
1. Our commitment to the disabled child. Koop E. Caring; 1985 May; 4(5):23-5, 95. PubMed ID: 10317637 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of respite care on parents' perceptions of quality of life. Joyce K, Singer M, Isralowitz R. Ment Retard; 1983 Aug; 21(4):153-6. PubMed ID: 6227792 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [II-- Proper role of nurseries in infant care]. Bacry A, Dubut L, Marie P. Soins Pediatr Pueric; 2003 Aug; (213):45-6. PubMed ID: 14562510 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Respite services in California: status and recommendations for improvement. Apolloni AH, Triest G. Ment Retard; 1983 Dec; 21(6):240-3. PubMed ID: 6231448 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Current concepts: the low-birth-weight infant--evolution of a changing outlook. Hack M, Fanaroff AA, Merkatz IR. N Engl J Med; 1979 Nov 22; 301(21):1162-5. PubMed ID: 492277 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Parental rights versus government responsibility for infant medical care. Reynolds WB. Conn Med; 1984 Aug 22; 48(8):527-9. PubMed ID: 6236950 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Technology-dependent children with prolonged care. Cooperation within home care services prevents parents' stress]. Ferngren H, Feychting H, Sundberg M. Lakartidningen; 1997 Jun 11; 94(24):2270, 2275-6. PubMed ID: 9213704 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Dealing with long-term problems: a parent's perspective. Eikner S. Neonatal Netw; 1986 Oct 11; 5(2):45-9. PubMed ID: 2945986 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Breast-feeding: are hospitals encouraging new mothers to reach for the bottle? Newman J. Leadersh Health Serv; 1994 Oct 11; 3(1):4. PubMed ID: 10132052 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Alternative birth centers: assessment of the risks and recommendations for operation. Natl Nosocomial Infect Study Rep; 1979 Nov 11; ():36-41. PubMed ID: 10245975 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Challenges and successes: the Baby-Friendly Initiative in Norway. Hansen MN, Bærug A, Nylander G, Häggkvist AP, Tufte E, Alquist R, Støre EG. J Hum Lact; 2012 Aug 11; 28(3):285-8. PubMed ID: 22723529 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Perspectives. Ethics in the hospital nursery. Mcgraw Hills Med Health; 1987 Nov 09; 41(44):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10284657 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Series: "Prevention of handicap." The quality of neonatal care in special and intensive care baby units. Michie MM. Midwives Chron; 1979 Mar 09; 92(1092):13-5. PubMed ID: 154606 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [A young family from the first pregnancy to the end of their child's first year of life]. Rajala K, Ruoppila I. Katilolehti; 1983 Dec 09; 88(12):335-40. PubMed ID: 6560050 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Care of the newborn in perinatal units in New Brunswick. CMAJ; 1986 Aug 01; 135(3):186-7, 189-90, 192. PubMed ID: 3730976 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Should newborn nursery viewing windows be eliminated? Writing for the PRO position. Buchko B. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 2002 Aug 01; 27(5):262. PubMed ID: 12209055 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Helping infants by seeing the invisible. Howe EG. J Clin Ethics; 2001 Aug 01; 12(3):191-204. PubMed ID: 11789062 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Failure to monitor "well baby": legalities. Case in point: Parker v. Southwest La. Hosp. Assn. (540 So. 1270--LA (1989)). Tammelleo AD. Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1989 Jun 01; 30(1):2. PubMed ID: 2748847 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]