These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

137 related items for PubMed ID: 10321157

  • 1. Accuracy of proximal caries depth determination using two intraoral film speeds.
    Jessee SA, Makins SR, Bretz WA.
    Gen Dent; 1999; 47(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 10321157
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. In vitro comparison of four different dental X-ray films and direct digital radiography for proximal caries detection.
    Alkurt MT, Peker I, Bala O, Altunkaynak B.
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):504-9. PubMed ID: 17910228
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A comparison of the accuracy of digital and conventional radiography in the diagnosis of recurrent caries.
    Anbiaee N, Mohassel AR, Imanimoghaddam M, Moazzami SM.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Dec 01; 11(6):E025-32. PubMed ID: 21203734
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Approximal carious lesion depth assessment with insight and ultraspeed films.
    Güngör K, Erten H, Akarslan ZZ, Celik I, Semiz M.
    Oper Dent; 2005 Dec 01; 30(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 15765958
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. An evaluation of the diagnostic yield from bitewing radiographs of small approximal and occlusal carious lesions in a low prevalence sample in vitro using different film types and speeds.
    Ricketts DN, Whaites EJ, Kidd EA, Brown JE, Wilson RF.
    Br Dent J; 1997 Jan 25; 182(2):51-8. PubMed ID: 9033139
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. TACT imaging of primary caries.
    Tyndall DA, Clifton TL, Webber RL, Ludlow JB, Horton RA.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Aug 25; 84(2):214-25. PubMed ID: 9269025
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Evaluation of the diagnostic advantage of intraoral D and E film for detecting interproximal caries.
    Ardakani FE, Davari A, Goodarzipour D, Goodarzipour K, Fallahzadeh H.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2004 Nov 15; 5(4):58-70. PubMed ID: 15558091
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Diagnosis of approximal caries: bite-wing radiology versus the Ultrasound Caries Detector. An in vitro study.
    Matalon S, Feuerstein O, Kaffe I.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 May 15; 95(5):626-31. PubMed ID: 12738956
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparing the performance of storage phosphor plate and Insight film images for the detection of proximal caries depth.
    Crombie K, Parker ME, Nortje CJ, Sanderink GC.
    SADJ; 2009 Nov 15; 64(10):452, 454-6, 458-9. PubMed ID: 20306863
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Mechanical defects in dental enamel vs. natural dental caries: observer differentiation using Ektaspeed Plus film.
    Kang B-C, Farman AG, Scarfe WC, Goldsmith LJ.
    Caries Res; 1996 Nov 15; 30(2):156-62. PubMed ID: 8833141
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Film tomography compared with film and digital bitewing radiography for proximal caries detection.
    Peker I, Toraman Alkurt M, Altunkaynak B.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Dec 15; 36(8):495-9. PubMed ID: 18033947
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A two-film versus a four-film bite-wing examination for caries diagnosis in adults.
    Hintze H, Wenzel A.
    Caries Res; 1999 Dec 15; 33(5):380-6. PubMed ID: 10460962
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Observer agreement in the detection of proximal caries with direct digital intraoral radiography.
    Naitoh M, Yuasa H, Toyama M, Shiojima M, Nakamura M, Ushida M, Iida H, Hayashi M, Ariji E.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Jan 15; 85(1):107-12. PubMed ID: 9474624
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.