These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

232 related items for PubMed ID: 10323015

  • 1. [A study on the contralateral suppressive effects of distortion product otoacoustic emissions].
    Wang H, Zhong N.
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1997 Nov; 11(11):489-92. PubMed ID: 10323015
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Separating the contributions of olivocochlear and middle ear muscle reflexes in modulation of distortion product otoacoustic emission levels.
    Wolter NE, Harrison RV, James AL.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2014 Nov; 19(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 24335024
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Contralateral suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions: effect of the primary frequency in Dpgrams.
    Zhang F, Boettcher FA, Sun XM.
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Apr; 46(4):187-95. PubMed ID: 17454232
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Distortion product otoacoustic emission contralateral suppression functions obtained with ramped stimuli.
    Purcell DW, Butler BE, Saunders TJ, Allen P.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2133-48. PubMed ID: 19062854
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Contralateral suppression of latency during distortion product otoacoustic emissions detection in guinea pigs].
    Kong W, Yang Y, Zhang W.
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Aug; 36(4):271-4. PubMed ID: 12761994
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Olivocochlear reflex effect on human distortion product otoacoustic emissions is largest at frequencies with distinct fine structure dips.
    Wagner W, Heppelmann G, Müller J, Janssen T, Zenner HP.
    Hear Res; 2007 Jan; 223(1-2):83-92. PubMed ID: 17137736
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Contralateral suppression of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions: a potential diagnostic tool to evaluate the vestibular nerve.
    Chang MY, Song JJ, Kim JS, Koo JW.
    Med Hypotheses; 2013 Nov; 81(5):830-3. PubMed ID: 24074898
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and efferent control of cochlea].
    Xu J, Liu C, Guo L, Lian N, Liu B.
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Dec; 36(6):436-40. PubMed ID: 12761959
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Repeatability of high-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adults.
    Dreisbach LE, Long KM, Lees SE.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):466-79. PubMed ID: 16957498
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Effects of selective attention on distortion product otoacoustic emissions].
    Wang H, Zhong N.
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1997 Dec; 11(12):543-5. PubMed ID: 10323024
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Clinical value of distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) and their contralateral suppression effects].
    Wang H, Zhong N.
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1999 Jan; 13(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 12564028
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Evaluation of the frequency selectivity of contralateral acoustic stimulation on the active mechanisms of the organ of corti by analyzing the changes in the amplitude of transitory evoked otoacoustic emissions and distortion products.
    Ibargüen AM, Santaolalla Montoya F, del Rey AS, Fernandez JM.
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Aug; 37(4):457-62. PubMed ID: 19128576
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Influence of aging on medial olivocochlear system function.
    Lisowska G, Namyslowski G, Orecka B, Misiolek M.
    Clin Interv Aging; 2014 Aug; 9():901-14. PubMed ID: 24959071
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The influence of common stimulus parameters on distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure.
    Johnson TA, Baranowski LG.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Aug; 33(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 21918451
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Increased amplitude of distortion product emissions in the human caused by contralateral low intensity acoustic stimulation].
    Nieschalk M, Beneking R, Stoll W.
    HNO; 1997 May; 45(5):378-84. PubMed ID: 9265021
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Contralateral noise has possible asymmetric frequency-sensitive effect on the 2F1-F2 otoacoustic emission in humans.
    Atcherson SR, Martin MJ, Lintvedt R.
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Jun 13; 438(1):107-10. PubMed ID: 18472335
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Transient otoacoustic emissions in the detection of olivocochlear bundle maturation.
    Gkoritsa E, Tsakanikos M, Korres S, Dellagrammaticas H, Apostolopoulos N, Ferekidis E.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Apr 13; 70(4):671-6. PubMed ID: 16198429
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [A research for basic properties of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normally hearing subjects].
    Liu A, Cui Y, Huang H.
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1998 Oct 13; 12(10):435-8. PubMed ID: 11263229
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [The application of otoacoustic emissions measurement in the assessment of the function of cochlear efferent fibers: the study of normal hearing subjects].
    Kotyło P, Sliwińska-Kowalska M.
    Otolaryngol Pol; 1999 Oct 13; 53(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 10337165
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Effect of inner ear hearing loss on delayed otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion products (DPOAE)].
    Hoth S.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Dec 13; 75(12):709-18. PubMed ID: 9081275
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.