These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

225 related items for PubMed ID: 10326334

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Acemannan hydrogel dressing versus saline dressing for pressure ulcers. A randomized, controlled trial.
    Thomas DR, Goode PS, LaMaster K, Tennyson T.
    Adv Wound Care; 1998 Oct; 11(6):273-6. PubMed ID: 10326343
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Occlusive vs gauze dressings for local wound care in surgical patients: a randomized clinical trial.
    Ubbink DT, Vermeulen H, Goossens A, Kelner RB, Schreuder SM, Lubbers MJ.
    Arch Surg; 2008 Oct; 143(10):950-5. PubMed ID: 18936373
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Hydrocolloid versus saline-gauze dressings in treating pressure ulcers: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Xakellis GC, Chrischilles EA.
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1992 May; 73(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 1580775
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Evaluation of a collagen-alginate wound dressing in the management of diabetic foot ulcers.
    Donaghue VM, Chrzan JS, Rosenblum BI, Giurini JM, Habershaw GM, Veves A.
    Adv Wound Care; 1998 May; 11(3):114-9. PubMed ID: 9729942
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A comparison of the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of two methods of managing pressure ulcers.
    Colwell JC, Foreman MD, Trotter JP.
    Decubitus; 1993 Jul; 6(4):28-36. PubMed ID: 8297488
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A comparison of Epi-Lock and saline dressings in the treatment of pressure ulcers.
    Kraft MR, Lawson L, Pohlmann B, Reid-Lokos C, Barder L.
    Decubitus; 1993 Nov; 6(6):42-4, 46, 48. PubMed ID: 8286026
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Vacuum-assisted closure versus saline-moistened gauze in the healing of postoperative diabetic foot wounds.
    McCallon SK, Knight CA, Valiulus JP, Cunningham MW, McCulloch JM, Farinas LP.
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2000 Aug; 46(8):28-32, 34. PubMed ID: 11189545
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Case report about the combined use of 2 moist wound dressings in the treatment of a chronic diabetic foot ulcer].
    Roselló Ruiz A.
    Rev Enferm; 1998 Oct; 21(242):suppl 9-12. PubMed ID: 10030155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Pressure ulcers--randomised controlled trial comparing hydrocolloid and saline gauze dressings.
    Chang KW, Alsagoff S, Ong KT, Sim PH.
    Med J Malaysia; 1998 Dec; 53(4):428-31. PubMed ID: 10971989
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a new synthetic polymer sheet wound dressing.
    Motta G, Dunham L, Dye T, Mentz J, O'Connell-Gifford E, Smith E.
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1999 Oct; 45(10):41, 44-6, 48-49. PubMed ID: 10687651
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A comparison of wound environments.
    Gates JL, Holloway GA.
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1992 Oct; 38(8):34-7. PubMed ID: 1482522
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Comparison of the effectiveness and cost of treatment with humid environment as compared to traditional cure. Clinical trial on primary care patients with venous leg ulcers and pressure ulcers].
    Capillas Pérez R, Cabré Aguilar V, Gil Colomé AM, Gaitano García A, Torra i Bou JE.
    Rev Enferm; 2000 Jan; 23(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 10788945
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The cost and efficacy of two wound treatments.
    Capasso VA, Munro BH.
    AORN J; 2003 May; 77(5):984-92, 995-7, 1000-4. PubMed ID: 12769329
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Randomized controlled trial of the absorbency of four dressings and their effects on the evaporation of burn wounds.
    Chen J, Han CM, Su GL, Tang ZJ, Su SJ, Lin XW.
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2007 Oct 20; 120(20):1788-91. PubMed ID: 18028772
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The management of lower-extremity ulcers with zinc-saline wet dressings versus normal saline wet dressings.
    Rittenhouse T.
    Adv Ther; 1996 Oct 20; 13(2):88-94. PubMed ID: 10163335
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Moist environment for healing: matching the dressing to the wound.
    Alvarez O.
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1988 Oct 20; 21():64-83. PubMed ID: 3074811
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Hydrogel wound dressings: where do we stand in 2003?
    Eisenbud D, Hunter H, Kessler L, Zulkowski K.
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2003 Oct 20; 49(10):52-7. PubMed ID: 14652421
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A cost and clinical effectiveness analysis among moist wound healing dressings versus traditional methods in home care patients with pressure ulcers.
    Souliotis K, Kalemikerakis I, Saridi M, Papageorgiou M, Kalokerinou A.
    Wound Repair Regen; 2016 May 20; 24(3):596-601. PubMed ID: 27037729
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [New products improve treatment of chronic leg ulcers. Fewer dressing changes reduce both the patients' inconveniences and the costs].
    Hansson C.
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Nov 15; 97(46):5310-2, 5315-6. PubMed ID: 11116869
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.