These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

274 related items for PubMed ID: 10335639

  • 1. Compression and expansion of the temporal envelope: evaluation of speech intelligibility and sound quality.
    van Buuren RA, Festen JM, Houtgast T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 May; 105(5):2903-13. PubMed ID: 10335639
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effects of multi-channel compression time constants on subjectively perceived sound quality and speech intelligibility.
    Hansen M.
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):369-80. PubMed ID: 12195179
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners.
    Rosengard PS, Payton KL, Braida LD.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 16197282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Understanding compression: modeling the effects of dynamic-range compression in hearing aids.
    Kates JM.
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 49(6):395-409. PubMed ID: 20225931
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effects of Hearing Loss and Fast-Acting Compression on Amplitude Modulation Perception and Speech Intelligibility.
    Wiinberg A, Jepsen ML, Epp B, Dau T.
    Ear Hear; 2019 Jun; 40(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 29668566
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Peaks in the frequency response of hearing aids: evaluation of the effects on speech intelligibility and sound quality.
    van Buuren RA, Festen JM, Houtgast T.
    J Speech Hear Res; 1996 Apr; 39(2):239-50. PubMed ID: 8729914
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Evaluation of a dual-channel full dynamic range compression system for people with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Moore BC, Johnson JS, Clark TM, Pluvinage V.
    Ear Hear; 1992 Oct; 13(5):349-70. PubMed ID: 1487095
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Listener Factors Associated with Individual Susceptibility to Reverberation.
    Reinhart PN, Souza PE.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Jan; 29(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 29309025
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Perceived Sound Quality Dimensions Influencing Frequency-Gain Shaping Preferences for Hearing Aid-Amplified Speech and Music.
    Vaisberg JM, Beaulac S, Glista D, Macpherson EA, Scollie SD.
    Trends Hear; 2021 Jan; 25():2331216521989900. PubMed ID: 33563136
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Working memory, age, and hearing loss: susceptibility to hearing aid distortion.
    Arehart KH, Souza P, Baca R, Kates JM.
    Ear Hear; 2013 Jan; 34(3):251-60. PubMed ID: 23291963
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Large-scale training to increase speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in novel noises.
    Chen J, Wang Y, Yoho SE, Wang D, Healy EW.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2604. PubMed ID: 27250154
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Perception of Hearing Aid-Processed Speech in Individuals with Late-Onset Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder.
    Mathai JP, Appu S.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 May; 26(10):815-23. PubMed ID: 26554487
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Real-time multiband dynamic compression and noise reduction for binaural hearing aids.
    Kollmeier B, Peissig J, Hohmann V.
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993 May; 30(1):82-94. PubMed ID: 8263832
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effect of Energy Equalization on the Intelligibility of Speech in Fluctuating Background Interference for Listeners With Hearing Impairment.
    D'Aquila LA, Desloge JG, Reed CM, Braida LD.
    Trends Hear; 2017 May; 21():2331216517710354. PubMed ID: 28602128
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Acoustical and Perceptual Comparison of Noise Reduction and Compression in Hearing Aids.
    Brons I, Houben R, Dreschler WA.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Aug 01; 58(4):1363-76. PubMed ID: 26090648
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III: Speech Intelligibility of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Völker C, Warzybok A, Ernst SM.
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec 30; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721922
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D, Ahlstrom JB, Bologna WJ, Dubno JR.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun 30; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The efficacy of a multichannel hearing aid in which the gain is controlled by the minima in the temporal signal envelope.
    Festen JM, van Dijkhuizen JN, Plomp R.
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993 Jun 30; 38():101-10. PubMed ID: 8153556
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.