These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

152 related items for PubMed ID: 10352618

  • 1. Abdominal helical CT: milk as a low-attenuation oral contrast agent.
    Thompson SE, Raptopoulos V, Sheiman RL, McNicholas MM, Prassopoulos P.
    Radiology; 1999 Jun; 211(3):870-5. PubMed ID: 10352618
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. MR imaging of the gastrointestinal tract with i.v., gadolinium and diluted barium oral contrast media compared with unenhanced MR imaging and CT.
    Low RN, Francis IR.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Oct; 169(4):1051-9. PubMed ID: 9308464
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Cost-effectiveness and patient tolerance of low-attenuation oral contrast material: milk versus VoLumen.
    Koo CW, Shah-Patel LR, Baer JW, Frager DH.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 May; 190(5):1307-13. PubMed ID: 18430848
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Upper gastrointestinal tract and abdomen: water as an orally administered contrast agent for helical CT.
    Winter TC, Ager JD, Nghiem HV, Hill RS, Harrison SD, Freeny PC.
    Radiology; 1996 Nov; 201(2):365-70. PubMed ID: 8888224
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Depiction of normal gastrointestinal anatomy with MDCT: comparison of low- and high-attenuation oral contrast media.
    Erturk SM, Mortelé KJ, Oliva MR, Ichikawa T, Silverman SG, Cantisani V, Pagliara E, Ros PR.
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Apr; 66(1):84-7. PubMed ID: 17604930
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Evaluation of bowel distention and bowel wall appearance by using neutral oral contrast agent for multi-detector row CT.
    Megibow AJ, Babb JS, Hecht EM, Cho JJ, Houston C, Boruch MM, Williams AB.
    Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 16293806
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Barium sulfate for abdominal computer assisted tomography.
    Hatfield KD, Segal SD, Tait K.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1980 Aug; 4(4):570. PubMed ID: 7391310
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Evaluation of the effects of bioadhesive substances as addition to oral contrast media: an experimental study].
    Conrad R, Schneider G, Textor J, Fimmers R, Sachse A, Schild HH.
    Rofo; 1998 Jun; 168(6):610-5. PubMed ID: 9687954
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Oral contrast for abdominal computed tomography in children: the effects on gastric fluid volume.
    Mahmoud M, McAuliffe J, Kim HY, Mishra P, Salisbury S, Schnell B, Hirsch P, Arbabi S, Donnelly LF.
    Anesth Analg; 2010 Nov; 111(5):1252-8. PubMed ID: 20736428
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Water as a contrast medium: a re-evaluation using the multidetector-row computed tomography.
    Makarawo TP, Negussie E, Malde S, Tilak J, Gayagoy J, Watson J, Francis F, Lincoln D, Jacobs MJ.
    Am Surg; 2013 Jul; 79(7):728-33. PubMed ID: 23816008
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Re: depiction of normal gastrointestinal anatomy with MDCT: comparison of low- and high-attenuation oral contrast media.
    Kennish SJ, Tolan DJ.
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Sep; 67(3):551; author reply 551. PubMed ID: 18684579
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. CT of the pancreas with a fat-density oral contrast regimen.
    Raptopoulos V, Davidoff A, Karellas A, Davis MA, Coolbaugh BL, Smith EH.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Jun; 150(6):1303-6. PubMed ID: 3259368
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Positive and negative oral contrast agents for combined abdominal and pelvic helical CT: first iodinated agent and second water.
    Matsuoka Y, Masumoto T, Koga H, Suzuki K, Ushimi T, Terada H, Tamura A, Yokoyama Y, Abe K, Kamata N.
    Radiat Med; 2000 Jun; 18(3):213-6. PubMed ID: 10972554
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Oral administration of intravenous contrast media: a tasty alternative to conventional oral contrast media in computed tomography].
    Diederichs G, Franiel T, Asbach P, Romano V, Hamm B, Rogalla P.
    Rofo; 2007 Oct; 179(10):1061-7. PubMed ID: 17786895
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of pasteurized whole milk, UHT whole milk, water, and diluted iodine contrast as computed tomographic enteric contrasts.
    Apisarnthanarak P, Tiangpug T, Pongpornsup S, Janpanich S, Suwannasit T.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2013 Apr; 96(4):467-76. PubMed ID: 23691702
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Evaluation of bowel distension and mural visualisation using neutral oral contrast agents for multidetector-row computed tomography.
    Lim BK, Bux SI, Rahmat K, Lam SY, Liew YW.
    Singapore Med J; 2012 Nov; 53(11):732-6. PubMed ID: 23192500
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Evaluation of "Gastromiro" for bowel opacification during computed tomography: comparison with diatrizoate and barium sulphate.
    Doyle GJ, O'Donnell SC, McDonald JR, Murthy LN, Keir MJ, Wright AR.
    Br J Radiol; 1993 Aug; 66(788):681-4. PubMed ID: 7719680
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Gastrointestinal tract wall visualization and distention during abdominal and pelvic multidetector CT with a neutral barium sulphate suspension: comparison with positive barium sulphate suspension and with water.
    Oliva MR, Erturk SM, Ichikawa T, Rocha T, Ros PR, Silverman SG, Mortele KJ.
    JBR-BTR; 2012 Aug; 95(4):237-42. PubMed ID: 23019990
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.