These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

611 related items for PubMed ID: 10358242

  • 1. Temporomandibular joint remodeling in adolescents and young adults during Herbst treatment: A prospective longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging and cephalometric radiographic investigation.
    Ruf S, Pancherz H.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jun; 115(6):607-18. PubMed ID: 10358242
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Temporomandibular joint growth adaptation in Herbst treatment: a prospective magnetic resonance imaging and cephalometric roentgenographic study.
    Ruf S, Pancherz H.
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Aug; 20(4):375-88. PubMed ID: 9753819
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Amount and direction of temporomandibular joint growth changes in Herbst treatment: a cephalometric long-term investigation.
    Pancherz H, Fischer S.
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Oct; 73(5):493-501. PubMed ID: 14580015
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Treatment effects of the edgewise Herbst appliance: a cephalometric and tomographic investigation.
    VanLaecken R, Martin CA, Dischinger T, Razmus T, Ngan P.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):582-93. PubMed ID: 17110255
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Temporomandibular joint growth changes in hyperdivergent and hypodivergent Herbst subjects. A long-term roentgenographic cephalometric study.
    Pancherz H, Michailidou C.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Aug; 126(2):153-61; quiz 254-5. PubMed ID: 15316469
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effective temporomandibular joint growth and chin position changes: Activator versus Herbst treatment. A cephalometric roentgenographic study.
    Baltromejus S, Ruf S, Pancherz H.
    Eur J Orthod; 2002 Dec; 24(6):627-37. PubMed ID: 12512780
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Cephalometric study of Class II Division 1 patients treated with an extended-duration, reinforced, banded Herbst appliance followed by fixed appliances.
    Tomblyn T, Rogers M, Andrews L, Martin C, Tremont T, Gunel E, Ngan P.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):818-830. PubMed ID: 27871709
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Improved clinical use of Twin-block and Herbst as a result of radiating viscoelastic tissue forces on the condyle and fossa in treatment and long-term retention: growth relativity.
    Voudouris JC, Kuftinec MM.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Mar; 117(3):247-66. PubMed ID: 10715086
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. "Effective condylar growth" and chin position changes in Herbst treatment: a cephalometric roentgenographic long-term study.
    Pancherz H, Ruf S, Kohlhas P.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Oct; 114(4):437-46. PubMed ID: 9790329
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Temporomandibular joint adaptations following two-phase therapy: an MRI study.
    Wadhawan N, Kumar S, Kharbanda OP, Duggal R, Sharma R.
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2008 Nov; 11(4):235-50. PubMed ID: 18950321
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. CT-scanning and radiographic analysis of temporomandibular joints and cephalometric analysis in a case of Herbst treatment in late puberty.
    Paulsen HU, Karle A, Bakke M, Herskind A.
    Eur J Orthod; 1995 Jun; 17(3):165-75. PubMed ID: 7621919
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Does bite-jumping damage the TMJ? A prospective longitudinal clinical and MRI study of Herbst patients.
    Ruf S, Pancherz H.
    Angle Orthod; 2000 Jun; 70(3):183-99. PubMed ID: 10926428
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Three-dimensional treatment outcomes in Class II patients treated with the Herbst appliance: a pilot study.
    LeCornu M, Cevidanes LH, Zhu H, Wu CD, Larson B, Nguyen T.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Dec; 144(6):818-30. PubMed ID: 24286905
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Effects of orthodontic treatment with fixed functional orthopaedic appliances on the condyle-fossa relationship in the temporomandibular joint: a magnetic resonance imaging study (Part I).
    Kinzinger GS, Roth A, Gülden N, Bücker A, Diedrich PR.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Sep; 35(5):339-46. PubMed ID: 16940482
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Herbst appliance therapy and temporomandibular joint disc position: a prospective longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Aidar LA, Abrahão M, Yamashita HK, Dominguez GC.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Apr; 129(4):486-96. PubMed ID: 16627174
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A cephalometric and tomographic evaluation of Herbst treatment in the mixed dentition.
    Croft RS, Buschang PH, English JD, Meyer R.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Oct; 116(4):435-43. PubMed ID: 10511673
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Post-treatment effects of the Herbst appliance. A radiographic, clinical and biometric investigation.
    Hansen K.
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1992 Oct; 88():1-49. PubMed ID: 1492308
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Diagnostic image analyses of activator treated temporomandibular joint in growth and maturing stages.
    Uematsu H, Ichida T, Masumi S, Morimoto Y, Tanaka T, Konoo T, Yamaguchi K.
    Cranio; 2002 Oct; 20(4):254-63. PubMed ID: 12403183
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. "Effective" TMJ and chin position changes in Class II treatment.
    Serbesis-Tsarudis C, Pancherz H.
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):813-8. PubMed ID: 18298212
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The influence of functional appliance therapy on glenoid fossa remodeling.
    Woodside DG, Metaxas A, Altuna G.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 Sep; 92(3):181-98. PubMed ID: 3477085
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 31.