These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

167 related items for PubMed ID: 10360200

  • 21. Marginal adaptation of compomers in Class I and V cavities in primary molars.
    el-Kalla IH.
    Am J Dent; 1999 Feb; 12(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 10477997
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Compomers as Class II restorations in primary molars.
    Gross LC, Griffen AL, Casamassimo PS.
    Pediatr Dent; 2001 Feb; 23(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 11242726
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Clinical evaluation of hybrid ionomer restoratives in Class V abrasion lesions: two-year results.
    Abdalla AI, Alhadainy HA.
    Quintessence Int; 1997 Apr; 28(4):255-8. PubMed ID: 10332375
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract) in class III cavities: three-year results.
    Demirci M, Ersev H, Uçok M.
    Oper Dent; 2002 Apr; 27(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 12022451
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. One-year evaluation of atraumatic restorative treatment and minimum intervention techniques on primary teeth.
    Louw AJ, Sarvan I, Chikte UM, Honkala E.
    SADJ; 2002 Sep; 57(9):366-71. PubMed ID: 12494713
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Compomers adaptation to Class I and V cavities in permanent teeth.
    el-Kalla IH, García-Godoy F.
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2000 Sep; 67(1):29-36, 8. PubMed ID: 10736655
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Clinical evaluation of Class II combined amalgam-composite restorations in primary molars after 6 to 30 months.
    Holan G, Chosack A, Eidelman E.
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1996 Sep; 63(5):341-5. PubMed ID: 8958346
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. The marginal seal of various restorative materials in primary molars.
    Morabito A, Defabianis P.
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1997 Sep; 22(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 9643205
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. A two-year clinical study of light-cured composite and amalgam restorations in primary molars.
    Barr-Agholme M, Odén A, Dahllöf G, Modeér T.
    Dent Mater; 1991 Oct; 7(4):230-3. PubMed ID: 1814768
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition.
    Yengopal V, Harneker SY, Patel N, Siegfried N.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Apr 15; (2):CD004483. PubMed ID: 19370602
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Artificial formed caries-like lesions around esthetic restorative materials.
    Attar N, Onen A.
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2002 Apr 15; 26(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 11990054
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results.
    Yip HK, Smales RJ, Yu C, Gao XJ, Deng DM.
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan 15; 33(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 11887531
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Clinical performance of a compomer and amalgam for the interproximal restoration of primary molars: a 24-month evaluation.
    Duggal MS, Toumba KJ, Sharma NK.
    Br Dent J; 2002 Sep 28; 193(6):339-42. PubMed ID: 12368893
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Evaluation of esthetic parameters of resin-modified glass-ionomer materials and a polyacid-modified resin composite in Class V cervical lesions.
    Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G.
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Sep 28; 30(9):607-14. PubMed ID: 10765866
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Clinical evaluation of glass ionomer-silver cermet restorations in primary molars: one year results.
    Hung TW, Richardson AS.
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1990 Mar 28; 56(3):239-40. PubMed ID: 2110027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Clinical evaluation of polyacid-modified resin composite posterior restorations: one-year results.
    Luo Y, Lo EC, Fang DT, Wei SH.
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Oct 28; 31(9):630-6. PubMed ID: 11203987
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Clinical evaluation of glass-ionomer tunnel restorations in primary molars: 36 months results.
    Markovic D, Peric T.
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Mar 28; 53(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 18304240
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Split mouth randomized controlled clinical trial of beveled cavity preparations in primary molars: an 18-Month follow up.
    Oliveira CA, Dias PF, Dos Santos MP, Maia LC.
    J Dent; 2008 Sep 28; 36(9):754-8. PubMed ID: 18579283
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. WITHDRAWN: Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition.
    Yengopal V, Harnekar SY, Patel N, Siegfried N.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Oct 17; 10(10):CD004483. PubMed ID: 27748505
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Replacements of restorations in the primary and young permanent dentition.
    Wendt LK, Koch G, Birkhed D.
    Swed Dent J; 1998 Oct 17; 22(4):149-55. PubMed ID: 9850557
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.