These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

167 related items for PubMed ID: 10360200

  • 41. Marginal and internal adaptation of stratified compomer-composite Class II restorations.
    Dietschi D, Bindi G, Krejci I, Davidson C.
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):500-9. PubMed ID: 12216570
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42. Evidence-based assessment of tooth-colored restorations in proximal lesions of primary molars.
    Toh SL, Messer LB.
    Pediatr Dent; 2007; 29(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 18041507
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43. Cervical compomer restorations: the role of cavity etching in a 48-month clinical evaluation.
    Di Lenarda R, Cadenaro M, De Stefano Dorigo E.
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):382-7. PubMed ID: 11203846
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months.
    Gao W, Peng D, Smales RJ, Yip KH.
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 12674356
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer).
    Tyas MJ.
    Oper Dent; 1998 Jan; 23(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 9573792
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46. Longevity of occlusally-stressed restorations in posterior primary teeth.
    Hickel R, Kaaden C, Paschos E, Buerkle V, García-Godoy F, Manhart J.
    Am J Dent; 2005 Jun; 18(3):198-211. PubMed ID: 16158813
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47. Clinical evaluation of four Class 5 restorative materials: 3-year recall.
    Burgess JO, Gallo JR, Ripps AH, Walker RS, Ireland EJ.
    Am J Dent; 2004 Jun; 17(3):147-50. PubMed ID: 15301207
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48. Factors influencing dentists' choice of amalgam and tooth-colored restorative materials for Class II preparations in younger patients.
    Vidnes-Kopperud S, Tveit AB, Gaarden T, Sandvik L, Espelid I.
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2009 Jun; 67(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 19085213
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49. Glass ionomer-silver cermet Class II tunnel-restorations for primary molars.
    Croll TP.
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1988 Jun; 55(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 2968382
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50. Marginal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in Class II conservative preparations.
    Duncalf WV, Wilson NH.
    Quintessence Int; 2001 May; 32(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 11444073
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51. Durability of a polyacid-modified composite resin (compomer) in primary molars. A multicenter study.
    Andersson-Wenckert IE, Folkesson UH, van Dijken JW.
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1997 Aug; 55(4):255-60. PubMed ID: 9298168
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52. 3-year evaluation of a new open sandwich technique in Class II cavities.
    Lindberg A, van Dijken JW, Lindberg M.
    Am J Dent; 2003 Feb; 16(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 12744410
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53. Clinical evaluation of four different dental restorative materials: one-year results.
    Daou MH, Tavernier B, Meyer JM.
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2008 Feb; 118(4):290-5. PubMed ID: 18491670
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55. Inhibition of artificial secondary caries in root by fluoride-releasing restorative materials.
    Torii Y, Itota T, Okamoto M, Nakabo S, Nagamine M, Inoue K.
    Oper Dent; 2001 Feb; 26(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 11203775
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56. A clinical study of the "open sandwich" technique in pediatric dental practice.
    Cannon ML.
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2003 Feb; 70(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 12762613
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57. Nine-year evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite open sandwich technique in Class II cavities.
    Lindberg A, van Dijken JW, Lindberg M.
    J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 16956709
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59. A one-year clinical evaluation of a high-viscosity glass ionomer cement in primary molars.
    Yilmaz Y, Eyuboglu O, Kocogullari ME, Belduz N.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Feb 15; 7(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 16491149
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60. Two-year clinical evaluation of three restorative materials in primary molars.
    Daou MH, Tavernier B, Meyer JM.
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2009 Feb 15; 34(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 19953810
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.