These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

200 related items for PubMed ID: 10363062

  • 1. [Performance assessment of mammographic diagnostic systems: evolution of methods and their application to a digital image study].
    Compagnone G, Ferruzzi K, Pierotti L, Vianello Vos C, Berardi P, Bergamini C.
    Radiol Med; 1999 Mar; 97(3):179-87. PubMed ID: 10363062
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Free-response methodology: alternate analysis and a new observer-performance experiment.
    Chakraborty DP, Winter LH.
    Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):873-81. PubMed ID: 2305073
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Ideal AFROC and FROC observers.
    Khurd P, Liu B, Gindi G.
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Feb; 29(2):375-86. PubMed ID: 20129845
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Perceptually based FROC analysis.
    Arora R, Kundel HL, Beam CA.
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Dec; 12(12):1567-74. PubMed ID: 16321746
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Recent advances in observer performance methodology: jackknife free-response ROC (JAFROC).
    Chakraborty DP.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Dec; 114(1-3):26-31. PubMed ID: 15933077
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
    Sorribas A, March J, Trujillano J.
    Stat Med; 2002 May 15; 21(9):1213-35. PubMed ID: 12111875
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Digital chest radiography with a large image intensifier. Evaluation of diagnostic performance and patient exposure.
    Månsson LG, Kheddache S, Schlossman D, Börjesson J, Håkansson E, Mattsson S, Tylén U.
    Acta Radiol; 1989 May 15; 30(4):337-42. PubMed ID: 2775592
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
    Liang Z, Du X, Liu J, Yao X, Yang Y, Li K.
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul 15; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. On the meaning of the weighted alternative free-response operating characteristic figure of merit.
    Chakraborty DP, Zhai X.
    Med Phys; 2016 May 15; 43(5):2548. PubMed ID: 27147365
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Multimodality computerized diagnosis of breast lesions using mammography and sonography.
    Drukker K, Horsch K, Giger ML.
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Aug 15; 12(8):970-9. PubMed ID: 16087091
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Visual perception studies and observer models in medical imaging.
    Burgess AE.
    Semin Nucl Med; 2011 Nov 15; 41(6):419-36. PubMed ID: 21978445
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Correlation of free-response and receiver-operating-characteristic area-under-the-curve estimates: results from independently conducted FROC∕ROC studies in mammography.
    Zanca F, Hillis SL, Claus F, Van Ongeval C, Celis V, Provoost V, Yoon HJ, Bosmans H.
    Med Phys; 2012 Oct 15; 39(10):5917-29. PubMed ID: 23039631
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Nonparametric signal detectability evaluation using an exponential transformation of the FROC curve.
    Popescu LM.
    Med Phys; 2011 Oct 15; 38(10):5690-702. PubMed ID: 21992384
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. VIEWDEX: an efficient and easy-to-use software for observer performance studies.
    Håkansson M, Svensson S, Zachrisson S, Svalkvist A, Båth M, Månsson LG.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Oct 15; 139(1-3):42-51. PubMed ID: 20200105
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Observer studies involving detection and localization: modeling, analysis, and validation.
    Chakraborty DP, Berbaum KS.
    Med Phys; 2004 Aug 15; 31(8):2313-30. PubMed ID: 15377098
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Maximum likelihood fitting of FROC curves under an initial-detection-and-candidate-analysis model.
    Edwards DC, Kupinski MA, Metz CE, Nishikawa RM.
    Med Phys; 2002 Dec 15; 29(12):2861-70. PubMed ID: 12512721
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Spatial localization accuracy of radiologists in free-response studies: Inferring perceptual FROC curves from mark-rating data.
    Chakraborty D, Yoon HJ, Mello-Thoms C.
    Acad Radiol; 2007 Jan 15; 14(1):4-18. PubMed ID: 17178361
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A program for computing the prediction probability and the related receiver operating characteristic graph.
    Jordan D, Steiner M, Kochs EF, Schneider G.
    Anesth Analg; 2010 Dec 15; 111(6):1416-21. PubMed ID: 21059744
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.