These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

155 related items for PubMed ID: 10366205

  • 21. Complication rate of venous access procedures performed by a radiology practitioner assistant compared with interventional radiology physicians and supervised trainees.
    Benham JR, Culp WC, Wright LB, McCowan TC.
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2007 Aug; 18(8):1001-4. PubMed ID: 17675618
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. The late complications of totally implantable central venous access ports: the results from an Italian multicenter prospective observation study.
    Dal Molin A, Rasero L, Guerretta L, Perfetti E, Clerico M.
    Eur J Oncol Nurs; 2011 Dec; 15(5):377-81. PubMed ID: 21167777
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Technical benefits and outcomes of modified upwardly created subcutaneous chest pockets for placing central venous ports: single-center experience.
    Lee SH, Chun HJ, Choi BG.
    Acta Radiol; 2009 May; 50(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 19267272
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Central venous catheter placement by an interventional radiology unit: an Australian experience.
    Lee MK, Mossop PJ, Vrazas JI.
    Australas Radiol; 2007 Feb; 51(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 17217487
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Experience with the intravenous totally implanted port in patients with gynecologic malignancies.
    Nelson BE, Mayer AR, Tseng PC, Schwartz PE.
    Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Apr; 53(1):98-102. PubMed ID: 8175028
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Factors predicting subcutaneous implanted central venous port function: the relationship between catheter tip location and port failure in patients with gynecologic malignancies.
    Cohn DE, Mutch DG, Rader JS, Farrell M, Awantang R, Herzog TJ.
    Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Dec; 83(3):533-6. PubMed ID: 11733967
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Tunneled internal jugular catheters in adult patients: comparison of outcomes in hemodialysis versus infusion catheters.
    Peynircioglu B, Ozkan F, Canyigit M, Cil BE, Balkanci F.
    Acta Radiol; 2007 Jul; 48(6):613-9. PubMed ID: 17611867
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. US-guided placement of central vein catheters in patients with disorders of hemostasis.
    Tercan F, Ozkan U, Oguzkurt L.
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Feb; 65(2):253-6. PubMed ID: 17482407
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Use of the right external jugular vein as the preferred access site when the right internal jugular vein is not usable.
    Cho SK, Shin SW, Do YS, Park KB, Choo SW, Choo IW.
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2006 May; 17(5):823-9. PubMed ID: 16687748
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Radiologic placement of tunneled central catheters: rates of success and of immediate complications in a large series.
    Docktor BL, Sadler DJ, Gray RR, Saliken JC, So CB.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Aug; 173(2):457-60. PubMed ID: 10430153
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Cost-effective supply use in permanent central venous catheter operations.
    Howard TJ, Stines CP, O'Connor JA, Schuster WS, Wiebke EA.
    Am Surg; 1997 May; 63(5):441-5. PubMed ID: 9128234
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Central venous access ports placed by interventional radiologists: experience with 125 consecutive patients.
    Lorch H, Zwaan M, Kagel C, Weiss HD.
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2001 May; 24(3):180-4. PubMed ID: 11443406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. [Long term central venous catheterization revisited].
    Palermo S, Campolucci A, Capozza F, Cammardella MP, Balestrero A, Ferrando F, Basta P, Launo C.
    Minerva Anestesiol; 1995 Nov; 61(11):451-6. PubMed ID: 8677035
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Long-term experience with a totally implanted catheter system in gynecologic oncologic patients.
    Koonings PP, Given FT.
    J Am Coll Surg; 1994 Feb; 178(2):164-6. PubMed ID: 8173727
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. [Long-term central venous access. Experience with 173 cases].
    Valeri A, Borrelli A, Bontà M, Lucchese M, Tonelli P, Alessio F.
    Minerva Chir; 1999 Nov; 54(11):769-75. PubMed ID: 10638150
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Follow-up of radiologically totally implanted central venous access ports of the upper arm: long-term complications in 127,750 catheter-days.
    Busch JD, Herrmann J, Heller F, Derlin T, Koops A, Adam G, Habermann CR.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Aug; 199(2):447-52. PubMed ID: 22826411
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Image-guided central venous catheters for apheresis.
    Sadler DJ, Gordon AC, Klassen J, Saliken JC, So CB, Gray RR.
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 1999 Jan; 23(2):179-82. PubMed ID: 10197805
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Transhepatic central venous catheter for long-term access in paediatric patients.
    Mortell A, Said H, Doodnath R, Walsh K, Corbally M.
    J Pediatr Surg; 2008 Feb; 43(2):344-7. PubMed ID: 18280287
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Percutaneous transfemoral repositioning of malpositioned central venous access device: a report of two cases.
    Chauhan A, Pathak K, Ganguly M.
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2010 Feb; 6(1):102-5. PubMed ID: 20479560
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.