These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

421 related items for PubMed ID: 10370416

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Image quality and radiation exposure in digital mammography with storage phosphor screens in a magnification technic].
    Fiedler E, Aichinger U, Böhner C, Säbel M, Schulz-Wendtland R, Bautz W.
    Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 10464507
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Amorphous silicon, flat-panel, x-ray detector versus storage phosphor-based computed radiography: contrast-detail phantom study at different tube voltages and detector entrance doses.
    Hamer OW, Völk M, Zorger Z, Feuerbach S, Strotzer M.
    Invest Radiol; 2003 Apr; 38(4):212-20. PubMed ID: 12649645
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Radiation exposure in full-field digital mammography with a selenium flat-panel detector].
    Gosch D, Jendrass S, Scholz M, Kahn T.
    Rofo; 2006 Jul; 178(7):693-7. PubMed ID: 16761214
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [X-ray phase imaging using a X-ray tube with a small focal spot -improvement of image quality in mammography-].
    Honda C, Ohara H, Ishisaka A, Shimada F, Endo T.
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002 Jul; 22(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 12766293
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Analysis of image quality in digital chest imaging.
    De Hauwere A, Bacher K, Smeets P, Verstraete K, Thierens H.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Jul; 117(1-3):174-7. PubMed ID: 16461499
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Experiences with phantom measurements in different mammographic systems].
    Schulz-Wendtland R, Aichinger U, Lell M, Kuchar I, Bautz W.
    Rofo; 2002 Oct; 174(10):1243-6. PubMed ID: 12375196
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [A bimetal anode with tungsten or rhodium? Comparative studies on image quality and dosage requirement in mammography].
    Funke M, Hermann KP, Breiter N, Moritz J, Müller D, Grabbe E.
    Rofo; 1995 Nov; 163(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 8527751
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 22.