These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

315 related items for PubMed ID: 10380129

  • 1. Comparison of threshold visual perimetry and objective pupil perimetry in clinical patients.
    Yoshitomi T, Matsui T, Tanakadate A, Ishikawa S.
    J Neuroophthalmol; 1999 Jun; 19(2):89-99. PubMed ID: 10380129
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparing pupil function with visual function in patients with Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy.
    Bremner FD, Shallo-Hoffmann J, Riordan-Eva P, Smith SE.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Oct; 40(11):2528-34. PubMed ID: 10509646
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of pupil perimetry and visual perimetry in normal eyes: decibel sensitivity and variability.
    Hong S, Narkiewicz J, Kardon RH.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Apr; 42(5):957-65. PubMed ID: 11274072
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Relation between relative afferent pupillary defect and suprathreshold automated perimetry].
    Wilhelm H, Meilinger S, Apfelstedt E.
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1997 Jun; 210(6):365-9. PubMed ID: 9333662
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparing threshold visual fields between the Dicon TKS 4000 automated perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Wong AY, Dodge RM, Remington LA.
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 Nov; 66(11):706-11. PubMed ID: 8576536
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Fundus perimetry with the Micro Perimeter 1 in normal individuals: comparison with conventional threshold perimetry.
    Springer C, Bültmann S, Völcker HE, Rohrschneider K.
    Ophthalmology; 2005 May; 112(5):848-54. PubMed ID: 15878065
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Pupillary dilation and its effects on automated perimetry results.
    Kudrna GR, Stanley MA, Remington LA.
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 Nov; 66(11):675-80. PubMed ID: 8576532
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of 24-2 and 30-2 perimetry in glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous optic neuropathies.
    Khoury JM, Donahue SP, Lavin PJ, Tsai JC.
    J Neuroophthalmol; 1999 Jun; 19(2):100-8. PubMed ID: 10380130
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Pupil perimetry using M-sequence stimulation technique.
    Wilhelm H, Neitzel J, Wilhelm B, Beuel S, Lüdtke H, Kretschmann U, Zrenner E.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Apr; 41(5):1229-38. PubMed ID: 10752964
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Pupillometer-based objective chromatic perimetry in normal eyes and patients with retinal photoreceptor dystrophies.
    Skaat A, Sher I, Kolker A, Elyasiv S, Rosenfeld E, Mhajna M, Melamed S, Belkin M, Rotenstreich Y.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Apr 17; 54(4):2761-70. PubMed ID: 23482470
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Feasibility of saccadic vector optokinetic perimetry: a method of automated static perimetry for children using eye tracking.
    Murray IC, Fleck BW, Brash HM, Macrae ME, Tan LL, Minns RA.
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Oct 17; 116(10):2017-26. PubMed ID: 19560207
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Multiple-stimulus presentation and voice control in automated perimetry.
    Mueller AJ, Lachenmayr BJ, Eckstein A, Hölzl M.
    Ger J Ophthalmol; 1992 Oct 17; 1(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 1477632
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Pupil perimetry with the Octopus 1-2-3. Initial experiences].
    Turtschi S, Bergamin O, Dubler B, Schötzau A, Zulauf M.
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1994 May 17; 204(5):398-9. PubMed ID: 8051881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Objective visual field measurement using "pupil perimetry"].
    Yoshitomi T, Matsui T, Mukuno K, Ishikawa S.
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1996 Oct 17; 100(10):825-31. PubMed ID: 8937108
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Correlation between confocal tomography of the optic nerve (HRT) and the perimetric frequency doubling technology].
    Sampaolesi R, Brusini P, Sampaolesi JR.
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2003 Nov 17; 220(11):754-66. PubMed ID: 14634902
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Transient pupillary light reflex in relation to fundus autofluorescence and dark-adapted perimetry in typical retinitis pigmentosa.
    Liu Y, Liu DN, Meng XH, Yin ZQ.
    Ophthalmic Res; 2012 Nov 17; 47(3):113-21. PubMed ID: 21997281
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Factors influencing normal perimetric thresholds obtained using the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Herse PR.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1992 Mar 17; 33(3):611-7. PubMed ID: 1544786
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Visual-field defects in well-defined retinal lesions using Humphrey and Dicon perimeters.
    Bass SJ, Feldman J.
    Optometry; 2000 Oct 17; 71(10):643-52. PubMed ID: 11063269
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Light perception and flicker perimetry. Effect of refractive error, artificial media opacities and pupillary size].
    Gleissner M, Lachenmayr BJ.
    Ophthalmologe; 1992 Apr 17; 89(2):162-5. PubMed ID: 1600326
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.