These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

711 related items for PubMed ID: 10388370

  • 1. Directed polymerization shrinkage versus a horizontal incremental filling technique: interfacial adaptation in vivo in Class II cavities.
    van Dijken JW, Hörstedt P, Waern R.
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):165-72. PubMed ID: 10388370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effect of interfacial bond quality on the direction of polymerization shrinkage flow in resin composite restorations.
    Cho BH, Dickens SH, Bae JH, Chang CG, Son HH, Um CM.
    Oper Dent; 2002 Aug; 27(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 12022463
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effect of composite resin placement techniques on the microleakage of two self-etching dentin-bonding agents.
    Santini A, Plasschaert AJ, Mitchell S.
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 11572288
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R, Sindel J, Krämer N, Petschelt A.
    Oper Dent; 1999 Jun; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The effect of additional enamel etching and a flowable composite to the interfacial integrity of Class II adhesive composite restorations.
    Belli S, Inokoshi S, Ozer F, Pereira PN, Ogata M, Tagami J.
    Oper Dent; 2001 Jun; 26(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 11203780
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparative in vivo and in vitro investigation of interfacial bond variability.
    Hannig M, Friedrichs C.
    Oper Dent; 2001 Jun; 26(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 11203774
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Influence of different softstart polymerization techniques on marginal adaptation of Class V restorations.
    Muangmingsuk A, Senawongse P, Yudhasaraprasithi S.
    Am J Dent; 2003 Apr; 16(2):117-9. PubMed ID: 12797570
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effect of wet and dry bonding techniques on marginal leakage.
    Santini A, Mitchell S.
    Am J Dent; 1998 Oct; 11(5):219-24. PubMed ID: 10388380
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Polymerization shrinkage: effects of constraint and filling technique in composite restorations.
    Loguercio AD, Reis A, Ballester RY.
    Dent Mater; 2004 Mar; 20(3):236-43. PubMed ID: 15209228
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid: an alternative concept for composite-to-enamel bonding.
    Hannig M, Reinhardt KJ, Bott B.
    Oper Dent; 1999 Mar; 24(3):172-80. PubMed ID: 10530279
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Marginal adaptation of resin-bonded light-cured glass ionomers in dentin cavities.
    Fritz UB, Finger WJ, Uno S.
    Am J Dent; 1996 Dec; 9(6):253-8. PubMed ID: 9545879
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effects of layering techniques on the micro-tensile bond strength to dentin in resin composite restorations.
    Niu Y, Ma X, Fan M, Zhu S.
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):129-34. PubMed ID: 18614225
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effect of posterior resin composite placement technique on the resin-dentin interface formed in vivo.
    Lopes GC, Baratieri LN, Monteiro S, Vieira LC.
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Feb; 35(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 15000640
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Polymerization shrinkage: effects of boundary conditions and filling technique of resin composite restorations.
    Loguercio AD, Reis A, Schroeder M, Balducci I, Versluis A, Ballester RY.
    J Dent; 2004 Aug; 32(6):459-70. PubMed ID: 15240064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Enamel and dentin bond strength and bonding mechanism to dentin of Gluma CPS to primary teeth.
    Fritz U, García-Godoy F, Finger WJ.
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1997 Aug; 64(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 9096816
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. An in-vitro study of microleakage around class V cavities bonded with a self-etching material versus a conventional two-bottle system.
    Salim S, Santini A, Husham A.
    Prim Dent Care; 2006 Jul; 13(3):107-11. PubMed ID: 16836814
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Marginal adaption of Class V restorations with and without "softstart-polymerization".
    Friedl KH, Schmalz G, Hiller KA, Märkl A.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Jul; 25(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 11203787
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of microleakage on one composite etched with phosphoric acid or a combination of phosphoric and hydrofluoric acids and bonded with several different systems.
    Szep S, Langner N, Bayer S, Börnichen D, Schulz C, Gerhardt T, Schriever A, Becker J, Heidemann D.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):161-9. PubMed ID: 12616236
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Laboratory evaluation of compomers in Class V restorations.
    Chersoni S, Lorenzi R, Ferrieri P, Prati C.
    Am J Dent; 1997 Jun; 10(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 9545890
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effect of dentin adhesives on the enamel-dentin/composite interfacial microleakage.
    Pradelle-Plasse N, Nechad S, Tavernier B, Colon P.
    Am J Dent; 2001 Dec; 14(6):344-8. PubMed ID: 11949792
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 36.