These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


218 related items for PubMed ID: 10408812

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Epidural block with ropivacaine and bupivacaine for elective caesarean section: maternal cardiovascular parameters, comfort and neonatal well-being.
    Kampe S, Tausch B, Paul M, Kasper SM, Bauer K, Diefenbach C, Kiencke P.
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2004 Jan; 20(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 14741065
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A comparison of epidural ropivacaine 0.75% and bupivacaine 0.5% with fentanyl for elective caesarean section.
    Christelis N, Harrad J, Howell PR.
    Int J Obstet Anesth; 2005 Jul; 14(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 15935650
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Clinical effects and maternal and fetal plasma concentrations of epidural ropivacaine versus bupivacaine for cesarean section.
    Datta S, Camann W, Bader A, VanderBurgh L.
    Anesthesiology; 1995 Jun; 82(6):1346-52. PubMed ID: 7793647
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Double-blind comparison of epidural ropivacaine 0.25% and bupivacaine 0.25%, for the relief of childbirth pain.
    Muir HA, Writer D, Douglas J, Weeks S, Gambling D, Macarthur A.
    Can J Anaesth; 1997 Jun; 44(6):599-604. PubMed ID: 9187778
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Epidural ropivacaine 1% with and without sufentanil addition for Caesarean section.
    Bachmann-Mennenga B, Veit G, Biscoping J, Steinicke B, Heesen M.
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2005 Apr; 49(4):525-31. PubMed ID: 15777301
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Hyperbaric spinal for elective Cesarean section--ropivacaine vs bupivacaine.
    Al-Abdulhadi O, Biehl D, Ong B, Boker A.
    Middle East J Anaesthesiol; 2007 Jun; 19(2):385-96. PubMed ID: 17684878
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A double-blind comparison of ropivacaine 0.5%, 0.75%, 1.0% and bupivacaine 0.5%, injected epidurally, in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy.
    Finucane BT, Sandler AN, McKenna J, Reid D, Milner AL, Friedlander M, Muzyka D, O'Callaghan-Enright S, Chan V.
    Can J Anaesth; 1996 May; 43(5 Pt 1):442-9. PubMed ID: 8723849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The effect of addition of low dose fentanyl to epidural bupivacaine (0.5%) in patients undergoing elective caesarean section: A randomized, parallel group, double blind, placebo controlled study.
    Parate LH, Manjrekar SP, Anandaswamy TC, Manjunath B.
    J Postgrad Med; 2015 May; 61(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 25511214
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Efficacy of sufentanil addition to ropivacaine epidural anaesthesia for Caesarean section.
    Bachmann-Mennenga B, Veit G, Steinicke B, Biscoping J, Heesen M.
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2005 Apr; 49(4):532-7. PubMed ID: 15777302
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A double-blind comparison of 0.25% ropivacaine and 0.25% bupivacaine for extradural analgesia in labour.
    Eddleston JM, Holland JJ, Griffin RP, Corbett A, Horsman EL, Reynolds F.
    Br J Anaesth; 1996 Jan; 76(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 8672383
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Motor block during patient-controlled epidural analgesia with ropivacaine or ropivacaine/fentanyl after intrathecal bupivacaine for caesarean section.
    Buggy DJ, Hall NA, Shah J, Brown J, Williams J.
    Br J Anaesth; 2000 Sep; 85(3):468-70. PubMed ID: 11103193
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.