These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

64 related items for PubMed ID: 10420856

  • 1. The real costs of screening mammography.
    Levant MN.
    CMAJ; 1999 Jul 13; 161(1):17-8. PubMed ID: 10420856
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Mammography screening in Germany: how, when and why?].
    Bick U.
    Rofo; 2006 Oct 13; 178(10):957-69. PubMed ID: 17021975
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Cost-effectiveness of mammography screening in Norway].
    Kåresen R, Bø JK, Haustveit S, Hervik A, Thoresen SO.
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1999 Oct 10; 119(24):3553-9. PubMed ID: 10563171
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Mammographic screening: does it work?
    Handler S.
    Minn Med; 2003 Dec 10; 86(12):6-7. PubMed ID: 14719608
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Benefits for national economy of mammography screening in Norway].
    Zahl PH.
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2000 Jan 20; 120(2):256-7. PubMed ID: 10851926
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effect of cost sharing on screening mammography.
    Dhalla IA, Kiran T.
    N Engl J Med; 2008 May 29; 358(22):2411; author reply 2411-2. PubMed ID: 18509131
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Setting calculations aside.
    Meyer CR.
    Minn Med; 2003 Dec 29; 86(12):2. PubMed ID: 14719607
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Psychological advantages and disadvantages of mammography screenings].
    Absetz P, Aro AR.
    Duodecim; 2003 Dec 29; 119(22):2138-44. PubMed ID: 14702798
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Is mammography screening efficient?].
    von Eyben FE.
    Lakartidningen; 1999 Nov 03; 96(44):4778-9. PubMed ID: 10584538
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Effect of screening programme on mortality from breast cancer. Investment in treatment would be more cost effective.
    Baum M, Tobias JS.
    BMJ; 2000 Dec 16; 321(7275):1528. PubMed ID: 11118189
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Estimating personal costs incurred by a woman participating in mammography screening in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.
    Ekwueme DU, Hall IJ, Richardson LC, Gardner JG, Royalty J, Thompson TD.
    Cancer; 2008 Aug 01; 113(3):592-601. PubMed ID: 18536027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A model-based comparison of breast cancer screening strategies: mammograms and clinical breast examinations.
    Shen Y, Parmigiani G.
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 Feb 01; 14(2):529-32. PubMed ID: 15734983
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Swedish mammographic screening. Annual costs 106 millions crowns, 2,7 percent of participants are further examined].
    Lundgren B.
    Lakartidningen; 1996 Jan 17; 93(3):126. PubMed ID: 8569321
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 4.