These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


110 related items for PubMed ID: 10420921

  • 21. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations.
    Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH.
    Radiology; 2002 Oct; 225(1):165-75. PubMed ID: 12355001
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Diagnosis of breast carcinoma. An evaluation of clinical examination, mammography, thermography and aspiration biopsy in breast disease.
    Bjurstam N, Hedberg K, Hultborn KA, Johansson NT, Johnsén C.
    Prog Surg; 1974 Oct; 13():1-65. PubMed ID: 4614325
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Diagnostic tests in breast cancer. Clinical strategies based on diagnostic probabilities.
    Mushlin AI.
    Ann Intern Med; 1985 Jul; 103(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 3890659
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. [Value of palpation and mammography in primary breast cancer. A retrospective study 1973-1982].
    de Waal JC, Baltzer J, Muthmann-Nagy C, Schmid M, Zander J.
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1987 Feb; 47(2):93-5. PubMed ID: 3569839
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Tc-99m MDP scintimammography in palpable and nonpalpable breast lesions: comparison with mammographic probability of malignancy.
    Atasever T, Ozdemir A, Turkölmez S, Altinok M, Isik S.
    Anticancer Res; 1999 Feb; 19(4C):3601-6. PubMed ID: 10629658
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Follow-up of palpable circumscribed noncalcified solid breast masses at mammography and US: can biopsy be averted?
    Graf O, Helbich TH, Fuchsjaeger MH, Hopf G, Morgun M, Graf C, Mallek R, Sickles EA.
    Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):850-6. PubMed ID: 15486217
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. [Diagnostic evaluation of breast nodules].
    Ciccarone M.
    Minerva Ginecol; 1994 Nov; 46(11):635-42. PubMed ID: 7854568
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. [The value of infrared and plate thermography in the early diagnosis of mastocarcinoma (author's transl)].
    Lohbeck HU, Frischbier HJ.
    Rontgenblatter; 1978 Jun; 31(6):329-32. PubMed ID: 675062
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. [Results of female breast diagnostics (author's transl)].
    Grosse-Vorholt R, Appel W, Klott KJ, Junker A.
    Rontgenblatter; 1979 May; 32(5):233-41. PubMed ID: 441651
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Reasons underlying negative mammography in patients with palpable breast cancer.
    Coveney EC, Geraghty JG, O'Laoide R, Hourihane JB, O'Higgins NJ.
    Clin Radiol; 1994 Feb; 49(2):123-5. PubMed ID: 8124890
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. The contribution of ultrasonography to the differential diagnosis of breast cancer.
    Ciatto S, Rosselli del Turco M, Catarzi S, Morrone D.
    Neoplasma; 1994 Feb; 41(6):341-5. PubMed ID: 7870218
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. [Investigation of palpable breast tumours. Patient flow and quality assessment of the tripple diagnostic procedure].
    Skaane P, Kåresen R, Jacobsen U, Amlie E, Sauer T, Skjørten F.
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1995 Jun 20; 115(16):1965-9. PubMed ID: 7638852
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Detection of early breast cancer: an overview and future prospects.
    Zhou XH, Gordon R.
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1989 Jun 20; 17(3):203-55. PubMed ID: 2673660
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. [Combined diagnosis of breast cancer recurrences after conservative treatment. Critical review of 143 consecutive cases].
    Ciatto S, Ambrogetti D, Muraca MG.
    Radiol Med; 1995 Oct 20; 90(4):383-5. PubMed ID: 8552813
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Breast fine needle aspiration cytology. Utility as a screening tool for clinically palpable lesions.
    Costa MJ, Tadros T, Hilton G, Birdsong G.
    Acta Cytol; 1993 Oct 20; 37(4):461-71. PubMed ID: 8328240
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Do mammography, sonography, and MR mammography have a diagnostic benefit compared with mammography and sonography?
    Müller-Schimpfle M, Stoll P, Stern W, Kurz S, Dammann F, Claussen CD.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 May 20; 168(5):1323-9. PubMed ID: 9129436
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Causes of breast cancer misdiagnosis at physical examination.
    Ciatto S, Rosselli del Turco M, Catarzi S, Cataliotti L, Cardona G, Teglia C, Pacini P, Caridi G.
    Neoplasma; 1991 May 20; 38(5):523-31. PubMed ID: 1956468
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Diagnosis of early breast cancer.
    Homer MJ.
    Am Fam Physician; 1981 Feb 20; 23(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 7457324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.