These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

104 related items for PubMed ID: 10422190

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Quality assessment in minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting.
    Diegeler A, Matin M, Falk V, Binner C, Walther T, Autschbach R, Mohr FW.
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1999 Nov; 16 Suppl 2():S67-72. PubMed ID: 10613560
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Minimally invasive direct redo coronary artery bypass grafting.
    Morishita A, Shimakura T, Miyagishima M, Kawamoto J, Morimoto H.
    Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2002 Aug; 8(4):209-12. PubMed ID: 12472384
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Repeat surgery for coronary artery bypass grafting: the role of the left thoracotomy approach.
    Harris DG, Coetzee AR, Augustyn JT, Saaiman A.
    Heart Surg Forum; 2009 Jun; 12(3):E163-7. PubMed ID: 19546070
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Hybrid coronary artery revascularization: logistics and program development.
    Friedrich GJ, Jonetzko P, Bonaros N, Schachner T, Danzmayr M, Kofler R, Laufer G, Pachinger O, Bonatti J.
    Heart Surg Forum; 2005 Jun; 8(4):E258-61. PubMed ID: 16112939
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. [MIDCAB for redo patients using the LITA-RA composite graft].
    Kano M, Fukata Y, Horike K, Kurushima A.
    Kyobu Geka; 2002 Mar; 55(3):252-6. PubMed ID: 11889816
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. The impact of intraoperative transit time flow measurement on the results of on-pump coronary surgery.
    Becit N, Erkut B, Ceviz M, Unlu Y, Colak A, Kocak H.
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2007 Aug; 32(2):313-8. PubMed ID: 17555979
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting versus stenting for patients with proximal left anterior descending coronary artery disease.
    Shirai K, Lansky AJ, Mehran R, Dangas GD, Costantini CO, Fahy M, Slack S, Mintz GS, Stone GW, Leon MB.
    Am J Cardiol; 2004 Apr 15; 93(8):959-62. PubMed ID: 15081435
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. MR angiography and flow quantification of the internal mammary artery graft after minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass.
    Miller S, Scheule AM, Hahn U, Jurmann M, Helber U, Duda SH, Stauder NI, Claussen CD.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 May 15; 172(5):1365-9. PubMed ID: 10227518
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. [Clinical factors influencing surgical approach selection of robotic-enhanced minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting].
    Cheng N, Gao CQ, Yang M, Wu Y.
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Nov 15; 51(11):1016-20. PubMed ID: 24444688
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.