These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

742 related items for PubMed ID: 10425003

  • 1. Structural valve deterioration in mitral replacement surgery: comparison of Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular porcine and perimount pericardial bioprostheses.
    Eric Jamieson WR, Marchand MA, Pelletier CL, Norton R, Pellerin M, Dubiel TW, Aupart MR, Daenen WJ, Holden MP, David TE, Ryba EA, Anderson WN.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1999 Aug; 118(2):297-304. PubMed ID: 10425003
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Mitral valve disease: if the mitral valve is not reparable/failed repair, is bioprosthesis suitable for replacement?
    Jamieson WR, Gudas VM, Burr LH, Janusz MT, Fradet GJ, Ling H, Germann E, Lichtenstein SV.
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):104-10. PubMed ID: 19056294
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Very late outcomes for mitral valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: 25-year follow-up of 450 implantations.
    Bourguignon T, Bouquiaux-Stablo AL, Loardi C, Mirza A, Candolfi P, Marchand M, Aupart MR.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Nov; 148(5):2004-2011.e1. PubMed ID: 24667021
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Carpentier-Edwards standard and supra-annular porcine bioprostheses: 10 year comparison of structural valve deterioration.
    Jamieson WR, Burr LH, Tyers GF, Munro AI.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 Jan; 3(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 8162218
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprostheses. Comparison of standard and supra-annular prostheses at 7 years.
    Jamieson WR, Tyers GF, Miyagishima RT, Germann E, Janusz MT, Ling H.
    Circulation; 1991 Nov; 84(5 Suppl):III145-52. PubMed ID: 1934404
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Performance of the Carpentier-Edwards SAV and Hancock-II porcine bioprostheses in aortic valve replacement.
    Jamieson WR, David TE, Feindel CM, Miyagishima RT, Germann E.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 May; 11(3):424-30. PubMed ID: 12056738
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Carpentier-Edwards standard and supraannular porcine bioprostheses: comparison of technology.
    Jamieson WR, Burr LH, Janusz MT, Munro AI, Hayden RI, Miyagishima RT, Ling H, Fradet GJ, Lichtenstein SV, Stewart KM.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1999 Jan; 67(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 10086520
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Porcine versus pericardial bioprostheses: eleven-year follow up of a prospective randomized trial.
    Chaudhry MA, Raco L, Muriithi EW, Bernacca GM, Tolland MM, Wheatley DJ.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 May; 9(3):429-37; discussion 437-8. PubMed ID: 10888102
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Pericardial Bioprosthesis in Chinese Patients with Single or Multiple Valve Replacement in Aortic, Mitral, or Tricuspid Positions.
    Guo H, Lu C, Huang H, Xie B, Liu J, Zheng S, Fan R, Chen J, Zhuang J.
    Cardiology; 2017 May; 138(2):97-106. PubMed ID: 28618423
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Late outcomes for aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: up to 17-year follow-up in 1,000 patients.
    McClure RS, Narayanasamy N, Wiegerinck E, Lipsitz S, Maloney A, Byrne JG, Aranki SF, Couper GS, Cohn LH.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2010 May; 89(5):1410-6. PubMed ID: 20417753
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Structural valve deterioration in elderly patient populations with the Carpentier-Edwards standard and supra-annular porcine bioprostheses: a comparative study.
    Burr LH, Jamieson WR, Munro AI, Miyagishima RT, Janusz MT, Ling H, Hayden RI, Tutassaura H, Fradet G, Gudas VM.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1992 Sep; 1(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 1341227
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprostheses: clinical performance assessed by actual analysis.
    Jamieson WR, Miyagishima RT, Burr LH, Lichtenstein SV, Fradet GJ, Janusz MT.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Jul; 9(4):530-5. PubMed ID: 10947046
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Durability after aortic valve replacement with the Mitroflow versus the Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis: a single-centre experience in 2393 patients.
    Nielsen PH, Hjortdal V, Modrau IS, Jensen H, Kimose HH, Terp K, Poulsen SH, Smerup M, Nielsen SL.
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jun; 49(6):1705-10. PubMed ID: 26984983
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A 25-year experience with Carpentier-Edwards Perimount in the mitral position.
    Ayegnon KG, Aupart M, Bourguignon T, Mirza A, May MA, Marchand M.
    Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2011 Feb; 19(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 21357312
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Aortic and mitral valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: 10-year results.
    Murakami T, Eishi K, Nakano S, Kobayashi J, Sasako Y, Isobe F, Kosakai Y, Kito Y, Kawashima Y.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Jan; 5(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 8834725
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Long-term evaluation of the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis].
    Takahara Y, Sudou Y, Murayama H, Nakamura T.
    Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1995 Aug; 43(8):1097-102. PubMed ID: 7594841
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Carpentier-Edwards standard porcine bioprosthesis: clinical performance to seventeen years.
    Jamieson WR, Munro AI, Miyagishima RT, Allen P, Burr LH, Tyers GF.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1995 Oct; 60(4):999-1006; discussion 1007. PubMed ID: 7575007
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Durability of pericardial versus porcine aortic valves.
    Gao G, Wu Y, Grunkemeier GL, Furnary AP, Starr A.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 Jul 21; 44(2):384-8. PubMed ID: 15261935
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The Carpentier-Edwards standard porcine bioprosthesis. A first-generation tissue valve with excellent long-term clinical performance.
    Jamieson WR, Allen P, Miyagishima RT, Gerein AN, Munro AI, Burr LH, Tyers GF.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1990 Mar 21; 99(3):543-61. PubMed ID: 2308373
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Durability of pericardial versus porcine bioprosthetic heart valves.
    Grunkemeier GL, Furnary AP, Wu Y, Wang L, Starr A.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Dec 21; 144(6):1381-6. PubMed ID: 23010581
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 38.