These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
160 related items for PubMed ID: 10431906
1. Loudness perception is influenced by long-term hearing aid use. Olsen SO, Rasmussen AN, Nielsen LH, Borgkvist BV. Audiology; 1999; 38(4):202-5. PubMed ID: 10431906 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The acoustic reflex threshold: not predictive for loudness perception in normally-hearing listeners. Olsen SO, Rasmussen AN, Nielsen LH, Borgkvist BV. Audiology; 1999; 38(6):303-7. PubMed ID: 10582530 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term test-retest reliability of category loudness scaling in normal-hearing subjects using pure-tone stimuli. Rasmussen AN, Olsen SO, Borgkvist BV, Nielsen LH. Scand Audiol; 1998; 27(3):161-7. PubMed ID: 9728776 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Loudness summation of equal loud narrowband signals in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Ewert SD, Oetting D. Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S71-S80. PubMed ID: 28971746 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids. Davidson LS. Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. In situ Hearing Tests for the Purpose of a Self-Fit Hearing Aid. Boymans M, Dreschler WA. Audiol Neurootol; 2017 May; 22(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 28434002 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The relationship between the uncomfortable loudness level and the acoustic reflex threshold for pure tones in normally-hearing and impaired listeners--a meta-analysis. Olsen SO. Audiology; 1999 May; 38(2):61-8. PubMed ID: 10206514 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Temporal integration of loudness in listeners with hearing losses of primarily cochlear origin. Buus S, Florentine M, Poulsen T. J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jun; 105(6):3464-80. PubMed ID: 10380670 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of threshold-based fitting strategies for nonlinear hearing aids. Stelmachowicz PG, Dalzell S, Peterson D, Kopun J, Lewis DL, Hoover BE. Ear Hear; 1998 Apr; 19(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 9562535 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Variability of most comfortable and uncomfortable loudness levels to speech stimuli in the hearing impaired. Sammeth CA, Birman M, Hecox KE. Ear Hear; 1989 Apr; 10(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 2707507 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Various uncomfortable loudness thresholds, their correlation and use in general practice]. Brügel FJ, Schorn K. Laryngorhinootologie; 1992 Nov; 71(11):572-5. PubMed ID: 1463566 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Tone decay for hearing-impaired listeners with and without dead regions in the cochlea. Huss M, Moore BC. J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Dec; 114(6 Pt 1):3283-94. PubMed ID: 14714809 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Recruitment detection--a comparison of category loudness scaling and classical supra-threshold audiometry]. Kiessling J, Pfreimer C, Schubert M. Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Jan; 75(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 8851113 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Acoustic reflex threshold and loudness in patients with unilateral hearing losses. Kawase T, Hidaka H, Ikeda K, Hashimoto S, Takasaka T. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1998 Jan; 255(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 9592667 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Categorical loudness scaling within the scope of hearing aid management]. von Wedel H, Meister H, Walger M. HNO; 2000 Mar; 48(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 10768109 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]