These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
182 related items for PubMed ID: 10432914
1. Birth defects surveillance: assessing the "gold standard". Honein MA, Paulozzi LJ. Am J Public Health; 1999 Aug; 89(8):1238-40. PubMed ID: 10432914 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Using an existing birth defects surveillance program to enhance surveillance data on stillbirths. Duke W, Gilboa SM. J Registry Manag; 2014 Aug; 41(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 24893183 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Birth certificates as a source for fetal alcohol syndrome case ascertainment--Georgia, 1989-1992. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 1995 Apr 07; 44(13):251-3. PubMed ID: 7898420 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program: 35 years of birth defects surveillance at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Correa-Villaseñor A, Cragan J, Kucik J, O'Leary L, Siffel C, Williams L. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2003 Sep 07; 67(9):617-24. PubMed ID: 14703783 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Problems in using birth certificate files in the capture-recapture model to estimate the completeness of case ascertainment in a population-based birth defects registry in New York State. Wang Y, Druschel CM, Cross PK, Hwang SA, Gensburg LJ. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2006 Nov 07; 76(11):772-7. PubMed ID: 17044070 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of selected characteristics of pregnancy drug registries. Honein MA, Paulozzi LJ, Cragan JD, Correa A. Teratology; 1999 Dec 07; 60(6):356-64. PubMed ID: 10590397 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of two surveillance strategies for selected birth defects in Florida. Salemi JL, Tanner JP, Kennedy S, Block S, Bailey M, Correia JA, Watkins SM, Kirby RS. Public Health Rep; 2012 Dec 07; 127(4):391-400. PubMed ID: 22753982 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Sensitivity of birth certificate reports of birth defects in Atlanta, 1995-2005: effects of maternal, infant, and hospital characteristics. Boulet SL, Shin M, Kirby RS, Goodman D, Correa A. Public Health Rep; 2011 Dec 07; 126(2):186-94. PubMed ID: 21387948 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the Sensitivity and Accuracy of Birth Defects Indicators on the 2003 Revision of the U.S. Birth Certificate: Has Data Quality Improved? Salemi JL, Tanner JP, Sampat DP, Rutkowski RE, Anjohrin SB, Marshall J, Kirby RS. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2017 Jan 07; 31(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 27859434 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Using a Birth Defects Surveillance Program to Enhance Existing Surveillance of Stillbirth. Duke W, Alverson CJ, Evans SP, Atkinson M, Ailes EC. J Registry Manag; 2022 Jan 07; 49(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 37260619 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Using an Existing Birth Defects Surveillance Program to Enhance Surveillance Data on Stillbirths. Duke W, Gilboa SM. J Registry Manag; 2019 Jan 07; 46(3):101-106. PubMed ID: 35364680 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]