These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

223 related items for PubMed ID: 10436476

  • 1. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) in Class II restorations of primary teeth: a two-year follow-up study.
    Papagiannoulis L, Kakaboura A, Pantaleon F, Kavvadia K.
    Pediatr Dent; 1999; 21(4):231-4. PubMed ID: 10436476
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer).
    Tyas MJ.
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 9573792
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study.
    Kavvadia K, Kakaboura A, Vanderas AP, Papagiannoulis L.
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Clinical evaluation of composite and compomer restorations in primary teeth: 24-month results.
    Pascon FM, Kantovitz KR, Caldo-Teixeira AS, Borges AF, Silva TN, Puppin-Rontani RM, Garcia-Godoy F.
    J Dent; 2006 Jul; 34(6):381-8. PubMed ID: 16242232
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract) in class III cavities: three-year results.
    Demirci M, Ersev H, Uçok M.
    Oper Dent; 2002 Jul; 27(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 12022451
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions.
    Ermiş RB.
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Jul; 33(7):542-8. PubMed ID: 12165991
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Marginal and internal adaptation of stratified compomer-composite Class II restorations.
    Dietschi D, Bindi G, Krejci I, Davidson C.
    Oper Dent; 2002 Jul; 27(5):500-9. PubMed ID: 12216570
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Clinical evaluation of Dyract in primary molars: 1-year results.
    Peters TC, Roeters JJ, Frankenmolen FW.
    Am J Dent; 1996 Apr; 9(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 9522693
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A 3-year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a composite and a compomer/composite (sandwich) in class II restorations.
    Wucher M, Grobler SR, Senekal PJ.
    Am J Dent; 2002 Aug; 15(4):274-8. PubMed ID: 12572648
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Clinical performance of pulpotomized primary molars restored with resin-based materials. 24-month results.
    Cehreli ZC, Cetinguc A, Cengiz SB, Altay AN.
    Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):262-6. PubMed ID: 17073200
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Tooth-colored filling materials for the restoration of cervical lesions: a 24-month follow-up study.
    Folwaczny M, Loher C, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hinkel R.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Oct; 25(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 11203827
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Three-year follow up assessment of Class II restorations in primary molars with a polyacid-modified composite resin and a hybrid composite.
    Attin T, Opatowski A, Meyer C, Zingg-Meyer B, Buchalla W, Mönting JS.
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 11572292
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Clinical evaluation of polyacid-modified resin composite posterior restorations: one-year results.
    Luo Y, Lo EC, Fang DT, Wei SH.
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Oct; 31(9):630-6. PubMed ID: 11203987
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Class II restorations with a polyacid-modified composite resin in primary molars placed in a dental practice: results of a two-year clinical evaluation.
    Attin T, Opatowski A, Meyer C, Zingg-Meyer B, Mönting JS.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Oct; 25(4):259-64. PubMed ID: 11203828
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. 3-year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite in Class III restorations.
    van Dijken JW.
    Am J Dent; 1996 Oct; 9(5):195-8. PubMed ID: 9545903
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and two polyacid-modified resin composites in cervical lesions restorations: 1-year follow-up.
    Chinelatti MA, Ramos RP, Chimello DT, Palma-Dibb RG.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Mar; 31(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 15025658
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Longevity of occlusally-stressed restorations in posterior primary teeth.
    Hickel R, Kaaden C, Paschos E, Buerkle V, García-Godoy F, Manhart J.
    Am J Dent; 2005 Jun; 18(3):198-211. PubMed ID: 16158813
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Clinical performance of posterior compomer restorations over 4 years.
    Krämer N, García-Godoy F, Reinelt C, Frankenberger R.
    Am J Dent; 2006 Feb; 19(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 16555660
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A clinical evaluation of a resin composite and a compomer in non-carious Class V lesions. A 3-year follow-up.
    Pollington S, van Noort R.
    Am J Dent; 2008 Feb; 21(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 18435377
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Cervical compomer restorations: the role of cavity etching in a 48-month clinical evaluation.
    Di Lenarda R, Cadenaro M, De Stefano Dorigo E.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Feb; 25(5):382-7. PubMed ID: 11203846
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.