These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

223 related items for PubMed ID: 10436476

  • 21. Conservative interproximal box-only polyacid modified composite restorations in primary molars, twelve-month clinical results.
    Marks LA, van Amerongen WE, Kreulen CM, Weerheijm KL, Martens LC.
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1999; 66(1):23-9, 12. PubMed ID: 10360200
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Assessment of compomer proximal restorations in primary molars: a retrospective study in children.
    Mass E, Gordon M, Fuks AB.
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1999; 66(2):93-7, 84. PubMed ID: 10431617
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Comparison of conventional versus colored compomers for class II restorations in primary molars: a 12-month clinical study.
    Ertugrul F, Cogulu D, Ozdemir Y, Ersin N.
    Med Princ Pract; 2010; 19(2):148-52. PubMed ID: 20134179
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Comparative clinical evaluation of different treatment approaches using a microfilled resin composite and a compomer in Class III cavities: two-year results.
    Demirci M, Yildiz E, Uysal O.
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 18335727
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Ketac Molar Versus Dyract Class II restorations in primary molars: twelve month clinical results.
    Marks LA, van Amerongen WE, Borgmeijer PJ, Groen HJ, Martens LC.
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2000; 67(1):37-41, 8-9. PubMed ID: 10736656
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Clinical evaluation of glass ionomers and compomers in Class V carious lesions.
    Abdalla AI, Alhadainy HA, García-Godoy F.
    Am J Dent; 1997 Feb; 10(1):18-20. PubMed ID: 9545915
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Three-year clinical performance of a compomer in stress-bearing restorations in permanent posterior teeth.
    Huth KC, Manhard J, Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH.
    Am J Dent; 2003 Aug; 16(4):255-9. PubMed ID: 14579881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Marginal adaption of Class V restorations with and without "softstart-polymerization".
    Friedl KH, Schmalz G, Hiller KA, Märkl A.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Aug; 25(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 11203787
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract) in Class III cavities: 5-year results.
    Demirci M, Ersev H, Sancakli HS, Topçubaşi M.
    Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):293-6. PubMed ID: 17073207
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. 4-year clinical performance and survival analysis of Class I and II compomer restorations in permanent teeth.
    Huth KC, Manhart J, Selbertinger A, Paschos E, Kaaden C, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R.
    Am J Dent; 2004 Feb; 17(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 15241910
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Nine-year evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite open sandwich technique in Class II cavities.
    Lindberg A, van Dijken JW, Lindberg M.
    J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 16956709
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. SEM and microleakage evaluation of the marginal integrity of two types of class V restorations with or without the use of a light-curable coating material and of polishing.
    Magni E, Zhang L, Hickel R, Bossù M, Polimeni A, Ferrari M.
    J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):885-91. PubMed ID: 18757129
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 6-year results.
    Busato AL, Loguercio AD, Reis A, Carrilho MR.
    Am J Dent; 2001 Oct; 14(5):304-8. PubMed ID: 11803995
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Clinical performance and wear resistance of two compomers in posterior occlusal restorations of permanent teeth: six-year follow-up.
    Lund RG, Sehn FP, Piva E, Detoni D, Moura FR, Cardoso PE, Demarco FF.
    Oper Dent; 2007 Oct; 32(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 17427819
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. 3-year evaluation of a new open sandwich technique in Class II cavities.
    Lindberg A, van Dijken JW, Lindberg M.
    Am J Dent; 2003 Feb; 16(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 12744410
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Clinical evaluation of four Class 5 restorative materials: 3-year recall.
    Burgess JO, Gallo JR, Ripps AH, Walker RS, Ireland EJ.
    Am J Dent; 2004 Jun; 17(3):147-50. PubMed ID: 15301207
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract AP) in Class I cavities: 3-year results.
    Demirci M, Uysal O.
    Am J Dent; 2006 Dec; 19(6):376-81. PubMed ID: 17212081
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Clinical evaluation of Dyract AP restorative in permanent molars: 2-year results.
    Luo Y, Lo EC, Fang DT, Smales RJ, Wei SH.
    Am J Dent; 2002 Dec; 15(6):403-6. PubMed ID: 12691278
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. SEM study of a self-etching primer adhesive system used for dentin bonding in primary and permanent teeth.
    da Silva Telles PD, Aparecida M, Machado M, Nör JE.
    Pediatr Dent; 2001 Dec; 23(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 11572489
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Surface texture and enamel-restoration interface of glass ionomer restorations.
    Sepet E, Aytepe Z, Oray H.
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1997 Dec; 21(3):231-5. PubMed ID: 9484132
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.