These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
289 related items for PubMed ID: 10445290
1. Size-disparity correlation in human binocular depth perception. Prince SJ, Eagle RA. Proc Biol Sci; 1999 Jul 07; 266(1426):1361-5. PubMed ID: 10445290 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Size-disparity correlation in stereopsis at contrast threshold. Smallman HS, MacLeod DI. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 1994 Aug 07; 11(8):2169-83. PubMed ID: 7931758 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Envelope size tuning for stereo-depth perception of small and large disparities. Schor CM, Edwards M, Sato M. Vision Res; 2001 Sep 07; 41(20):2555-67. PubMed ID: 11520503 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Stereo channels with different temporal frequency tunings. Lee S, Shioiri S, Yaguchi H. Vision Res; 2007 Feb 07; 47(3):289-97. PubMed ID: 17184805 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Vertical-size disparities are temporally integrated for slant perception. Fukuda K, Kaneko H, Matsumiya K. Vision Res; 2006 Sep 07; 46(17):2749-56. PubMed ID: 16600323 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Interocular correlation sensitivity and its relationship with stereopsis. Reynaud A, Hess RF. J Vis; 2018 Jan 01; 18(1):11. PubMed ID: 29362804 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Range and mechanism of encoding of horizontal disparity in macaque V1. Prince SJ, Cumming BG, Parker AJ. J Neurophysiol; 2002 Jan 01; 87(1):209-21. PubMed ID: 11784743 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Stereopsis loses dominance over relative size as target separation increases. Marlow P, Gillam BJ. Perception; 2011 Jan 01; 40(12):1413-27. PubMed ID: 22474761 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The structure of stereoscopic masking: position, disparity, and size tuning. Tyler CW, Kontsevich LL. Vision Res; 2005 Nov 01; 45(25-26):3096-108. PubMed ID: 16168458 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of interocular correlation and contrast on stereoscopic depth magnitude estimation. Cisarik PM, Harwerth RS. Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Mar 01; 85(3):164-73. PubMed ID: 18317331 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A normative dataset on human global stereopsis using the quick Disparity Sensitivity Function (qDSF). Reynaud A, Gao Y, Hess RF. Vision Res; 2015 Aug 01; 113(Pt A):97-103. PubMed ID: 26028556 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Evidence for elongated receptive field structure for mechanisms subserving stereopsis. Chen CC, Tyler CW. Vision Res; 2006 Sep 01; 46(17):2691-702. PubMed ID: 16580041 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of cue context on the perception of depth from combined disparity and perspective cues. Harwerth RS, Moeller MC, Wensveen JM. Optom Vis Sci; 1998 Jun 01; 75(6):433-44. PubMed ID: 9661212 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Coarse scales, fine scales, and their interactions in stereo vision. Farell B, Li S, McKee SP. J Vis; 2004 Jun 10; 4(6):488-99. PubMed ID: 15330716 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Size matters: Perceived depth magnitude varies with stimulus height. Tsirlin I, Wilcox LM, Allison RS. Vision Res; 2016 Jun 10; 123():41-5. PubMed ID: 27180656 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Depth aliasing by the transient-stereopsis system. Edwards M, Schor CM. Vision Res; 1999 Oct 10; 39(26):4333-40. PubMed ID: 10789427 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Vergence eye movements in response to binocular disparity without depth perception. Masson GS, Busettini C, Miles FA. Nature; 1997 Sep 18; 389(6648):283-6. PubMed ID: 9305842 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Interactions of spatial frequency and unequal monocular contrasts in stereopsis. Cormack LK, Stevenson SB, Landers DD. Perception; 1997 Sep 18; 26(9):1121-36. PubMed ID: 9509147 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]