These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

129 related items for PubMed ID: 10456634

  • 1. Relationship between atrioventricular delay and oxygen consumption in patients with sick sinus syndrome: relevance to rate responsive pacing.
    Meine M, Hexamer M, Werner J, Israel CW, Lemke B, Barmeyer J.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Jul; 22(7):1054-63. PubMed ID: 10456634
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Influence of the pacing rate on the atrioventricular conduction time during aerobic and anaerobic exercise: basic concepts for a dromotropically controlled rate responsive pacemaker.
    Meine M, Hexamer M, Werner J, Israel CW, Mügge A, Lemke B, Barmeyer J.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Dec; 22(12):1782-91. PubMed ID: 10642132
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. AAIR versus DDDR pacing in patients with impaired sinus node chronotropy: an echocardiographic and cardiopulmonary study.
    Vardas PE, Simantirakis EN, Parthenakis FI, Chrysostomakis SI, Skalidis EI, Zuridakis EG.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Jul; 20(7):1762-8. PubMed ID: 9249829
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [DDD versus DDDR pacemaker stimulation: comparison of cardiopulmonary performance, incidence of atrial arrhythmias and quality of life].
    Epperlein S, Kreft A, Siegert V, Liebrich A, Himmrich E, Treese N.
    Z Kardiol; 1996 Apr; 85(4):226-36. PubMed ID: 8693765
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Rate adaptive pacing in sick sinus syndrome: effects of pacing modes and intrinsic conduction on physiological responses, arrhythmias, symptomatology and quality of life.
    Lau CP, Tai YT, Leung WH, Wong CK, Lee P, Chung FL.
    Eur Heart J; 1994 Nov; 15(11):1445-55. PubMed ID: 7835358
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Control algorithm for the "dromotropic" cardiac pacemaker concept].
    Meine M, Hexamer M, Werner J, Israel CW, Lemke B, Barmeyer J.
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1998 Nov; 43 Suppl():350-1. PubMed ID: 9859393
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Usefulness of rate responsive atrial pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome.
    Hatano K, Kato R, Hayashi H, Noda S, Sotobata I, Murase M.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1989 Jan; 12(1 Pt 1):16-24. PubMed ID: 2464806
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Assessment of the chronotropic response at the anaerobic threshold: an objective measure of chronotropic function.
    Meine M, Achtelik M, Hexamer M, Kloppe A, Werner J, Trappe HJ.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 Oct; 23(10 Pt 1):1457-67. PubMed ID: 11060865
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Use of automatic mode change between DDD and AAI to facilitate native atrioventricular conduction in patients with sick sinus syndrome or transient atrioventricular block.
    Mayumi H, Kohno H, Yasui H, Kawachi Y, Tokunaga K.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 2):1740-7. PubMed ID: 8945033
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Correlations of heart rate and AV time to degree of performance: significance for the dromotropic pacemaker concept].
    Meine M, Hexamer M, Werner J, Lemke B, Barmeyer J.
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1997 Nov; 42 Suppl():271-2. PubMed ID: 9517147
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A new principle of rate adaptive pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome.
    Irnich W, Conrady J.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 Nov; 11(11 Pt 2):1823-8. PubMed ID: 2463553
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Benefits of rate-responsive pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome.
    Nishino M, Ito T, Miyawaki M, Nakagawa T, Kuryu T, Tanahashi H, Yamada Y, Abe H.
    Angiology; 1994 May; 45(5):353-60. PubMed ID: 8172382
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Atrial pacing for sick sinus syndrome.
    Rosenqvist M.
    Clin Cardiol; 1990 Jan; 13(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 2404646
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [An intrapatient comparison of adaptation to aerobic and anaerobic exertion during 3 types of physiological cardiac stimulation in chronotropic failure of the sinus node: DDD, VVIR and DDDR].
    Occhetta E, Perucca A, Fazzari M, Pistis G, Baduini G, Trevi G.
    Cardiologia; 1997 Jan; 42(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 9118155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [A technical regulating approach to dromotropic control of closed-loop frequency adjustment].
    Molina A, Urbaszek A, Schaldach M.
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1998 Jan; 43 Suppl():352-3. PubMed ID: 9859394
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Evaluation by cardiopulmonary exercise test of DDDR versus DDD pacing.
    Capucci A, Boriani G, Specchia S, Marinelli M, Santarelli A, Magnani B.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Nov; 15(11 Pt 2):1908-13. PubMed ID: 1279570
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Use of a rate responsive pacemaker in sick sinus syndrome].
    Ito T, Nishino M, Nakagawa T, Okada T, Hasegawa S, Kuryu T, Ebisuno S, Ohnishi S, Tanahashi H, Yasuno M.
    Kokyu To Junkan; 1993 Jan; 41(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 8434162
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. AV conduction with atrial rate adaptive pacing in the bradycardia tachycardia syndrome.
    Schwaab B, Fröhlig G, Pistorius C, Schwerdt H, Schieffer H.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Oct; 22(10):1502-9. PubMed ID: 10588153
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Rate-responsive pacing using the atrio-ventricular conduction time: design and test of a new algorithm.
    Hexamer M, Drewes C, Meine M, Kloppe A, Weckmüller J, Mügge A, Werner J.
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2004 Sep; 42(5):688-97. PubMed ID: 15503971
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.