These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

375 related items for PubMed ID: 10461235

  • 1. Lack of durability of the Mitroflow valve does not affect survival.
    Houel R, Le Besnerais P, Soustelle C, Kirsch M, Hillion ML, Loisance D.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jul; 8(4):368-74; discussion 374-5. PubMed ID: 10461235
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement with the new Mitroflow 12A pericardial bioprosthesis.
    García-Bengochea J, Sierra J, González-Juanatey JR, Rubio J, Vega M, Fernández AL, Sánchez D.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 May; 15(3):446-51; discussion 451-2. PubMed ID: 16784087
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Seventeen-year clinical results of 1,037 Mitroflow pericardial heart valve prostheses in the aortic position.
    Yankah CA, Schubel J, Buz S, Siniawski H, Hetzer R.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Mar; 14(2):172-9; discussion 179-80. PubMed ID: 15792176
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Biological versus mechanical aortic prosthesis? A nineteen-year comparison in a propensity-matched population.
    Bottio T, Rizzoli G, Caprili L, Testolin L, Thiene G, Gerosa G.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):493-500. PubMed ID: 16116876
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Durability of pericardial versus porcine aortic valves.
    Gao G, Wu Y, Grunkemeier GL, Furnary AP, Starr A.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 Jul 21; 44(2):384-8. PubMed ID: 15261935
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Porcine versus pericardial bioprostheses: eleven-year follow up of a prospective randomized trial.
    Chaudhry MA, Raco L, Muriithi EW, Bernacca GM, Tolland MM, Wheatley DJ.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 May 21; 9(3):429-37; discussion 437-8. PubMed ID: 10888102
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Mitroflow pericardial valve prosthesis in the aortic position: an analysis of long-term outcome and prognostic factors.
    Minami K, Boethig D, Mirow N, Kleikamp G, Koertke H, Godehardt E, Koerfer R.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Jan 21; 9(1):112-22. PubMed ID: 10678383
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Allografts for aortic valve or root replacement: insights from an 18-year single-center prospective follow-up study.
    Takkenberg JJ, Klieverik LM, Bekkers JA, Kappetein AP, Roos JW, Eijkemans MJ, Bogers AJ.
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2007 May 21; 31(5):851-9. PubMed ID: 17350857
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Durability after aortic valve replacement with the Mitroflow versus the Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis: a single-centre experience in 2393 patients.
    Nielsen PH, Hjortdal V, Modrau IS, Jensen H, Kimose HH, Terp K, Poulsen SH, Smerup M, Nielsen SL.
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jun 21; 49(6):1705-10. PubMed ID: 26984983
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Twenty-year clinical experience with porcine bioprostheses.
    Fann JI, Miller DC, Moore KA, Mitchell RS, Oyer PE, Stinson EB, Robbins RC, Reitz BA, Shumway NE.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1996 Nov 21; 62(5):1301-11; discussion 1311-2. PubMed ID: 8893561
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The Stentless Cryo-Life O'Brien porcine aortic valve at 10 years.
    Hvass U, Baron F, Elsebaey A, Nguyen D, Flecher E.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Nov 21; 13(6):977-83; discussion 983. PubMed ID: 15597593
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Performance of the Carpentier-Edwards SAV and Hancock-II porcine bioprostheses in aortic valve replacement.
    Jamieson WR, David TE, Feindel CM, Miyagishima RT, Germann E.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 May 21; 11(3):424-30. PubMed ID: 12056738
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Seventeen-year experience with the St. Jude medical biocor porcine bioprosthesis.
    Mykén PS.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul 21; 14(4):486-92. PubMed ID: 16116875
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Mitroflow aortic pericardial bioprosthesis--clinical performance.
    Jamieson WR, Koerfer R, Yankah CA, Zittermann A, Hayden RI, Ling H, Hetzer R, Dolman WB.
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Nov 21; 36(5):818-24. PubMed ID: 19700338
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. CarboMedics Mitroflow pericardial aortic bioprosthesis - performance in patients aged 60 years and older after 15 years.
    Benhameid O, Jamieson WR, Castella M, Carrier M, Pomar JL, Germann E, Pellerin M, Brownlee RT.
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Jun 21; 56(4):195-9. PubMed ID: 18481236
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Randomized, prospective assessment of bioprosthetic valve durability. Hancock versus Carpentier-Edwards valves.
    Sarris GE, Robbins RC, Miller DC, Mitchell RS, Moore KA, Stinson EB, Oyer PE, Reitz BA, Shumway NE.
    Circulation; 1993 Nov 21; 88(5 Pt 2):II55-64. PubMed ID: 8222197
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Aortic valve replacement with stentless porcine aortic valves: a ten-year experience.
    David TE, Feindel CM, Scully HE, Bos J, Rakowski H.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 May 21; 7(3):250-4. PubMed ID: 9651835
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Mitral valve disease: if the mitral valve is not reparable/failed repair, is bioprosthesis suitable for replacement?
    Jamieson WR, Gudas VM, Burr LH, Janusz MT, Fradet GJ, Ling H, Germann E, Lichtenstein SV.
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jan 21; 35(1):104-10. PubMed ID: 19056294
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Aortic valve replacement with the Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis: durability results up to 21 years.
    Yankah CA, Pasic M, Musci M, Stein J, Detschades C, Siniawski H, Hetzer R.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Sep 21; 136(3):688-96. PubMed ID: 18805273
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Twelve-year experience with the 19 mm Carpentier-Edwards pericardial aortic valve.
    Nakajima H, Aupart MR, Neville PH, Sirinelli AL, Meurisse YA, Marchand MA.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Sep 21; 7(5):534-9. PubMed ID: 9793853
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.