These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


99 related items for PubMed ID: 10461333

  • 1. Fetal outcome when the ultrasound estimate of the day of delivery is more than 14 days later than the last menstrual period estimate.
    Tunón K, Eik-Nes SH, Grøttum P.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jul; 14(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 10461333
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Fetal outcome in pregnancies defined as post-term according to the last menstrual period estimate, but not according to the ultrasound estimate.
    Tunón K, Eik-Nes SH, Grøttum P.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jul; 14(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 10461332
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A comparison between ultrasound and a reliable last menstrual period as predictors of the day of delivery in 15,000 examinations.
    Tunón K, Eik-Nes SH, Grøttum P.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Sep; 8(3):178-85. PubMed ID: 8915087
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Determinants and consequences of discrepancies in menstrual and ultrasonographic gestational age estimates.
    Morin I, Morin L, Zhang X, Platt RW, Blondel B, Bréart G, Usher R, Kramer MS.
    BJOG; 2005 Feb; 112(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 15663577
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Mid-trimester ultrasound prediction of gestational age: advantages and systematic errors.
    Källén K.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Dec; 20(6):558-63. PubMed ID: 12493044
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The biologic error in gestational length related to the use of the first day of last menstrual period as a proxy for the start of pregnancy.
    Nakling J, Buhaug H, Backe B.
    Early Hum Dev; 2005 Oct; 81(10):833-9. PubMed ID: 16084037
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Outcomes of congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a population-based study in Western Australia.
    Colvin J, Bower C, Dickinson JE, Sokol J.
    Pediatrics; 2005 Sep; 116(3):e356-63. PubMed ID: 16140678
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Gestational sac diameter in very early pregnancy as a predictor of fetal outcome.
    Oh JS, Wright G, Coulam CB.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Sep; 20(3):267-9. PubMed ID: 12230450
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Determination of the expected day of delivery--ultrasound has not been shown to be more accurate than the calendar method].
    Olsen O, Clausen JA.
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1998 Mar 30; 160(14):2088-90. PubMed ID: 9604677
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Vitamin K antagonists and pregnancy outcome. A multi-centre prospective study.
    Schaefer C, Hannemann D, Meister R, Eléfant E, Paulus W, Vial T, Reuvers M, Robert-Gnansia E, Arnon J, De Santis M, Clementi M, Rodriguez-Pinilla E, Dolivo A, Merlob P.
    Thromb Haemost; 2006 Jun 30; 95(6):949-57. PubMed ID: 16732373
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis.
    Jackson RA, Gibson KA, Wu YW, Croughan MS.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Mar 30; 103(3):551-63. PubMed ID: 14990421
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.