These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Comparison of conventional Papanicolaou smears and a fluid-based, thin-layer system for cervical cancer screening. Lee KR, Ashfaq R, Birdsong GG, Corkill ME, McIntosh KM, Inhorn SL. Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Aug; 90(2):278-84. PubMed ID: 9241308 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Utility of liquid-based cytology for cervical carcinoma screening: results of a population-based study conducted in a region of Costa Rica with a high incidence of cervical carcinoma. Hutchinson ML, Zahniser DJ, Sherman ME, Herrero R, Alfaro M, Bratti MC, Hildesheim A, Lorincz AT, Greenberg MD, Morales J, Schiffman M. Cancer; 1999 Apr 25; 87(2):48-55. PubMed ID: 10227593 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the ThinPrep Pap test in clinical practice. A seven-month, 16,314-case experience in northern Vermont. Papillo JL, Zarka MA, St John TL. Acta Cytol; 1998 Apr 25; 42(1):203-8. PubMed ID: 9479341 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Cytologic features of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in thinprep papanicolaou test slides and conventional smears: comparison of cases that performed poorly with those that performed well in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology. Renshaw AA, Dubray-Benstein B, Haja J, Hughes JH, Cytopathology Resource Committee, College of American Pathologists. Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2005 Jan 25; 129(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 15628904 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative study: conventional cervical and ThinPrep Pap tests in a routine clinical setting. Grace A, McBrearty P, Troost S, Thornhill M, Kay E, Leader M. Cytopathology; 2002 Aug 25; 13(4):200-5. PubMed ID: 12269892 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]