These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

132 related items for PubMed ID: 10484869

  • 21. Increased detection of epithelial cell abnormalities by liquid-based gynecologic cytology preparations. A review of accumulated data.
    Austin RM, Ramzy I.
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):178-84. PubMed ID: 9479337
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Computer-assisted rescreening of clinically important false negative cervical smears using the PAPNET Testing System.
    Rosenthal DL, Acosta D, Peters RK.
    Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(1):120-6. PubMed ID: 8604564
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. PAPNET analysis of reportedly negative smears preceding the diagnosis of a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or carcinoma.
    Sherman ME, Mango LJ, Kelly D, Paull G, Ludin V, Copeland C, Solomon D, Schiffman MH.
    Mod Pathol; 1994 Jun; 7(5):578-81. PubMed ID: 7937724
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Evaluation of the PAPNET cytologic screening system for quality control of cervical smears.
    Koss LG, Lin E, Schreiber K, Elgert P, Mango L.
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1994 Feb; 101(2):220-9. PubMed ID: 8116579
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Automated cervical cytology: meta-analyses of the performance of the PAPNET system.
    Abulafia O, Sherer DM.
    Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1999 Apr; 54(4):253-64. PubMed ID: 10198930
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Papnet-assisted, primary screening of cervico-vaginal smears.
    Duggan MA.
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2000 Apr; 21(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 10726616
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. PAPNET-assisted rescreening of cervical smears: cost and accuracy compared with a 100% manual rescreening strategy.
    O'Leary TJ, Tellado M, Buckner SB, Ali IS, Stevens A, Ollayos CW.
    JAMA; 1998 Jan 21; 279(3):235-7. PubMed ID: 9438746
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. A Multi-Institutional Feasibility Study on the Use of Automated Screening Systems for Quality Control Rescreening of Cervical Cytology.
    Sugiyama Y, Sasaki H, Komatsu K, Yabushita R, Oda M, Yanoh K, Ueda M, Itamochi H, Okugawa K, Fujita H, Tase T, Nakatani E, Moriya T.
    Acta Cytol; 2016 Jan 21; 60(5):451-457. PubMed ID: 27673689
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Differences between false-negative and true-positive Papanicolaou smears on Papnet-assisted review.
    Mitchell H, Medley G.
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1998 Aug 21; 19(2):138-40. PubMed ID: 9702494
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Quality control of cervical cytology in high-risk women. PAPNET system compared with manual rescreening.
    Bergeron C, Masseroli M, Ghezi A, Lemarie A, Mango L, Koss LG.
    Acta Cytol; 2000 Aug 21; 44(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 10740599
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. PAPNET for cervical cytology screening. Experience in Greece.
    Veneti S, Papaefthimiou M, Symiakaki H, Ioannidou-Mouzaka L.
    Acta Cytol; 1999 Aug 21; 43(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 9987447
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. ASCUS on cervical cytologic smears. Clinical significance.
    Yang M, Zachariah S.
    J Reprod Med; 1997 Jun 21; 42(6):329-31. PubMed ID: 9219118
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Significant reduction in the rate of false-negative cervical smears with neural network-based technology (PAPNET Testing System).
    Koss LG, Sherman ME, Cohen MB, Anes AR, Darragh TM, Lemos LB, McClellan BJ, Rosenthal DL, Keyhani-Rofagha S, Schreiber K, Valente PT.
    Hum Pathol; 1997 Oct 21; 28(10):1196-203. PubMed ID: 9343327
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. A feasibility study of the AutoPap system location-guided screening.
    Lee JS, Kuan L, Oh S, Patten FW, Wilbur DC.
    Acta Cytol; 1998 Oct 21; 42(1):221-6. PubMed ID: 9479344
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Rescreening of atypical cervicovaginal smears using PAPNET.
    Lerma E, Colomo L, Carreras A, Esteva E, Quilez M, Prat J.
    Cancer; 1998 Dec 25; 84(6):361-5. PubMed ID: 9915138
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Reproducibility in double scanning of cervical smears with the PAPNET system.
    Doornewaard H, van der Schouw YT, van der Graaf Y.
    Acta Cytol; 2000 Dec 25; 44(4):604-10. PubMed ID: 10934954
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. The AutoPap system for primary screening in cervical cytology. Comparing the results of a prospective, intended-use study with routine manual practice.
    Wilbur DC, Prey MU, Miller WM, Pawlick GF, Colgan TJ.
    Acta Cytol; 1998 Dec 25; 42(1):214-20. PubMed ID: 9479343
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Performance of a semiautomated Papanicolaou smear screening system: results of a population-based study conducted in Guanacaste, Costa Rica.
    Sherman ME, Schiffman M, Herrero R, Kelly D, Bratti C, Mango LJ, Alfaro M, Hutchinson ML, Mena F, Hildesheim A, Morales J, Greenberg MD, Balmaceda I, Lorincz AT.
    Cancer; 1998 Oct 25; 84(5):273-80. PubMed ID: 9801201
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Results of a control quality strategy in cervical cytology.
    Gullo CE, Dami AL, Barbosa AP, Marques AM, Palmejani MA, de Lima LG, Bonilha JL.
    Einstein (Sao Paulo); 2012 Oct 25; 10(1):86-91. PubMed ID: 23045833
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Simulation of primary cervical cancer screening by the PAPNET system in an unscreened, high-risk community.
    Michelow PM, Hlongwane NF, Leiman G.
    Acta Cytol; 1997 Oct 25; 41(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 9022732
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.