These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

327 related items for PubMed ID: 10486474

  • 1. Randomized comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labor.
    Nunes F, Rodrigues R, Meirinho M.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Sep; 181(3):626-9. PubMed ID: 10486474
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Misoprostol: an effective agent for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Wing DA, Rahall A, Jones MM, Goodwin TM, Paul RH.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 172(6):1811-6. PubMed ID: 7778637
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
    Ozkan S, Calişkan E, Doğer E, Yücesoy I, Ozeren S, Vural B.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Intravaginal glyceryl trinitrate and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labor.
    Nunes FP, Campos AP, Pedroso SR, Leite CF, Avillez TP, Rodrigues RD, Meirinho M.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 194(4):1022-6. PubMed ID: 16580291
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A comparison of misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Wing DA, Jones MM, Rahall A, Goodwin TM, Paul RH.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 172(6):1804-10. PubMed ID: 7778636
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Chang CH, Chang FM.
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 May; 96(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 9170825
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of two different doses of misoprostol suppositories with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Khoury AN, Zhou QP, Gorenberg DM, Nies BM, Manley GE, Mecklenburg FE.
    J Matern Fetal Med; 2001 Jun; 10(3):186-92. PubMed ID: 11444788
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of misoprostol with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Wing DA, Ortiz-Omphroy G, Paul RH.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep; 177(3):612-8. PubMed ID: 9322632
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Agarwal N, Gupta A, Kriplani A, Bhatla N, Parul.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2003 Jun; 29(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 12841697
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison between vaginal misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Neiger R, Greaves PC.
    Tenn Med; 2001 Jan; 94(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 11194687
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Misoprostol is more efficacious for labor induction than prostaglandin E2, but is it associated with more risk?
    Kolderup L, McLean L, Grullon K, Safford K, Kilpatrick SJ.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jun; 180(6 Pt 1):1543-50. PubMed ID: 10368502
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Outpatient misoprostol compared with dinoprostone gel for preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
    Meyer M, Pflum J, Howard D.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):466-72. PubMed ID: 15738009
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparative efficacy and cost of the prostaglandin analogs dinoprostone and misoprostol as labor preinduction agents.
    Ramsey PS, Harris DY, Ogburn PL, Heise RH, Magtibay PM, Ramin KD.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Feb; 188(2):560-5. PubMed ID: 12592272
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A comparison of intravaginal misoprostol and intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for ripening of unfavorable cervix and labor induction.
    Herabutya Y, O-Prasertsawat P, Pokpirom J.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 1997 Aug; 23(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 9311179
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Efficacy and safety of intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone for labor induction at term: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Liu A, Lv J, Hu Y, Lang J, Ma L, Chen W.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Apr; 40(4):897-906. PubMed ID: 24698022
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Intravaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone as cervical ripening and labor-inducing agents.
    Fletcher H, Mitchell S, Frederick J, Simeon D, Brown D.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Feb; 83(2):244-7. PubMed ID: 8290188
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A randomized comparison of one single dose of vaginal 50 microg misoprostol with 3 mg dinoprostone in pre-induction cervical ripening.
    Charoenkul S, Sripramote M.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2000 Sep; 83(9):1026-34. PubMed ID: 11075969
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Votipka JR.
    J Fam Pract; 1997 Jul; 45(1):20. PubMed ID: 9228905
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Oral and vaginal misoprostol compared with dinoprostone for induction of labor: a randomized controlled trial.
    le Roux PA, Olarogun JO, Penny J, Anthony J.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Feb; 99(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 11814497
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Induction of labor with intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone.
    Ozgür K, Kizilates A, Uner M, Erman O, Trak B.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1997 Feb; 261(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 9451517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.