These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

196 related items for PubMed ID: 10492544

  • 1. Assessing the clinical effectiveness of an aerosol reduction device for the air polisher.
    Muzzin KB, King TB, Berry CW.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Sep; 130(9):1354-9. PubMed ID: 10492544
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The effectiveness of an aerosol reduction device for ultrasonic scalers.
    King TB, Muzzin KB, Berry CW, Anders LM.
    J Periodontol; 1997 Jan; 68(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 9029451
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effectiveness of antimicrobial mouthrinses on aerosols produced by an air polisher.
    Bay NL, Overman PR, Krust-Bray K, Cobb C, Gross KB.
    J Dent Hyg; 1993 Jan; 67(6):312-7. PubMed ID: 17233164
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Aerosol reduction during air polishing.
    Harrel SK, Barnes JB, Rivera-Hidalgo F.
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Sep; 30(9):623-8. PubMed ID: 10765868
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A study to evaluate and compare the efficacy of preprocedural mouthrinsing and high volume evacuator attachment alone and in combination in reducing the amount of viable aerosols produced during ultrasonic scaling procedure.
    Devker NR, Mohitey J, Vibhute A, Chouhan VS, Chavan P, Malagi S, Joseph R.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Sep 01; 13(5):681-9. PubMed ID: 23250175
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Efficacy of preprocedural mouth rinsing in reducing aerosol contamination produced by ultrasonic scaler: a pilot study.
    Gupta G, Mitra D, Ashok KP, Gupta A, Soni S, Ahmed S, Arya A.
    J Periodontol; 2014 Apr 01; 85(4):562-8. PubMed ID: 23855840
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Compare the effcacy of two commercially available mouthrinses in reducing viable bacterial count in dental aerosol produced during ultrasonic scaling when used as a preprocedural rinse.
    Shetty SK, Sharath K, Shenoy S, Sreekumar C, Shetty RN, Biju T.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Sep 01; 14(5):848-51. PubMed ID: 24685786
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The usefulness of the modified extra-oral vacuum aspirator (EOVA) from household vacuum cleaner in reducing bacteria in dental aerosols.
    Teanpaisan R, Taeporamaysamai M, Rattanachone P, Poldoung N, Srisintorn S.
    Int Dent J; 2001 Dec 01; 51(6):413-6. PubMed ID: 11789707
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of suction device with saliva ejector for aerosol and spatter reduction during ultrasonic scaling.
    Holloman JL, Mauriello SM, Pimenta L, Arnold RR.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2015 Jan 01; 146(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 25569495
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Clinical use of an aerosol-reduction device with an ultrasonic scaler.
    Harrel SK.
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1996 Dec 01; 17(12):1185-93; quiz 1194. PubMed ID: 9161132
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Evaluation of aerosol contamination during debonding procedures.
    Toroğlu MS, Haytaç MC, Köksal F.
    Angle Orthod; 2001 Aug 01; 71(4):299-306. PubMed ID: 11510639
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A laboratory comparison of evacuation devices on aerosol reduction.
    Jacks ME.
    J Dent Hyg; 2002 Aug 01; 76(3):202-6. PubMed ID: 12271865
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Efficacy of preprocedural rinsing with an antiseptic in reducing viable bacteria in dental aerosols.
    Fine DH, Mendieta C, Barnett ML, Furgang D, Meyers R, Olshan A, Vincent J.
    J Periodontol; 1992 Oct 01; 63(10):821-4. PubMed ID: 1403589
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Reducing bacterial aerosol contamination with a chlorhexidine gluconate pre-rinse.
    Logothetis DD, Martinez-Welles JM.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1995 Dec 01; 126(12):1634-9. PubMed ID: 7499664
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The effectiveness of the "Clean-Area-System" for infection control in the dental clinic.
    Noro A, Suyama Y, Takahashi E, Chattin BR, Hirai Y, Takahashi K, Ishikawa T.
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1998 Feb 01; 39(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 9663027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A clinical investigation of dental evacuation systems in reducing aerosols.
    Suprono MS, Won J, Savignano R, Zhong Z, Ahmed A, Roque-Torres G, Zhang W, Oyoyo U, Richardson P, Caruso J, Handysides R, Li Y.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2021 Jun 01; 152(6):455-462. PubMed ID: 34044977
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Dental bioaerosol as an occupational hazard in a dentist's workplace.
    Szymańska J.
    Ann Agric Environ Med; 2007 Jun 01; 14(2):203-7. PubMed ID: 18247451
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effect of chlorhexidine, povidone iodine, and ozone on microorganisms in dental aerosols: randomized double-blind clinical trial.
    Kaur R, Singh I, Vandana KL, Desai R.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2014 Jun 01; 25(2):160-5. PubMed ID: 24992844
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effectiveness evaluation of different suction systems.
    Junevicius J, Surna A, Surna R.
    Stomatologija; 2005 Jun 01; 7(2):52-7. PubMed ID: 16254467
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Evaluating spatter and aerosol contamination during dental procedures.
    Bentley CD, Burkhart NW, Crawford JJ.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1994 May 01; 125(5):579-84. PubMed ID: 8195499
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.