These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

386 related items for PubMed ID: 10494022

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Evaluation of high-flux hemodiafiltration efficiency using an on-line urea monitor.
    Canaud B, Bosc JY, Leblanc M, Garred LJ, Vo T, Mion C.
    Am J Kidney Dis; 1998 Jan; 31(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 9428455
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A simple method for the calculation of dialysis Kt factor as a quantitative measure of removal efficiency of uremic retention solutes: Applicability to high-dialysate vs low-dialysate volume technologies.
    Colussi G, Brunati CCM, Gervasi F, Montoli A, Vergani D, Curci F, Minetti E.
    PLoS One; 2020 Jan; 15(5):e0233331. PubMed ID: 32469929
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Monitoring hemodialysis dose with ionic dialisance in on-line hemodiafiltration].
    Maduell F, Puchades MJ, Navarro V, Torregrosa E, Rius A, Sánchez JJ.
    Nefrologia; 2005 Jan; 25(5):521-6. PubMed ID: 16392302
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Change from conventional haemodiafiltration to on-line haemodiafiltration.
    Maduell F, del Pozo C, Garcia H, Sanchez L, Hdez-Jaras J, Albero MD, Calvo C, Torregrosa I, Navarro V.
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 1999 May; 14(5):1202-7. PubMed ID: 10344362
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Optimization of dialysate flow in on-line hemodiafiltration.
    Maduell F, Ojeda R, Arias-Guillén M, Fontseré N, Vera M, Massó E, Gómez M, Rodas L, Bazán G, Jiménez-Hernández M, Piñeiro G, Rico N.
    Nefrologia; 2015 May; 35(5):473-8. PubMed ID: 26306957
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Quantitative assessment of sodium mass removal using ionic dialysance and sodium gradient as a proxy tool: Comparison of high-flux hemodialysis versus online hemodiafiltration.
    Rodriguez A, Morena M, Bargnoux AS, Chenine L, Leray-Moragues H, Cristol JP, Canaud B.
    Artif Organs; 2021 Aug; 45(8):E280-E292. PubMed ID: 33507535
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Adequacy of haemodialysis and nutrition in maintenance haemodialysis patients: clinical evaluation of a new on-line urea monitor.
    Chauveau P, Naret C, Puget J, Zins B, Poignet JL.
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 1996 Aug; 11(8):1568-73. PubMed ID: 8856213
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Change from three times a week on-line hemodiafiltration to short daily on-line hemodiafiltration.
    Maduell F, Navarro V, Torregrosa E, Rius A, Dicenta F, Cruz MC, Ferrero JA.
    Kidney Int; 2003 Jul; 64(1):305-13. PubMed ID: 12787423
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. On-line haemodiafiltration. Remarkable removal of beta2-microglobulin. Long-term clinical observations.
    Lornoy W, Becaus I, Billiouw JM, Sierens L, Van Malderen P, D'Haenens P.
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2000 Jul; 15 Suppl 1():49-54. PubMed ID: 10737167
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Clinical cross-over comparison of mid-dilution hemodiafiltration using a novel dialyzer concept and post-dilution hemodiafiltration.
    Krieter DH, Falkenhain S, Chalabi L, Collins G, Lemke HD, Canaud B.
    Kidney Int; 2005 Jan; 67(1):349-56. PubMed ID: 15610261
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Imprecision of the hemodialysis dose when measured directly from urea removal. Hemodialysis Study Group.
    Depner TA, Greene T, Gotch FA, Daugirdas JT, Keshaviah PR, Star RA.
    Kidney Int; 1999 Feb; 55(2):635-47. PubMed ID: 9987088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Online hemodiafiltration versus acetate-free biofiltration: a prospective crossover study.
    Ding F, Ahrenholz P, Winkler RE, Ramlow W, Tiess M, Michelsen A, Pätow W.
    Artif Organs; 2002 Feb; 26(2):169-80. PubMed ID: 11879247
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Mixed predilution and postdilution online hemodiafiltration compared with the traditional infusion modes.
    Pedrini LA, De Cristofaro V, Pagliari B, Samà F.
    Kidney Int; 2000 Nov; 58(5):2155-65. PubMed ID: 11044237
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Reprocessing high-flux polysulfone dialyzers does not negatively impact solute removal in short-daily online hemodiafiltration.
    Melo NC, Moyses RM, Elias RM, Castro MC.
    Hemodial Int; 2014 Apr; 18(2):473-80. PubMed ID: 24393428
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.