These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

213 related items for PubMed ID: 10501755

  • 41. Illness severity scoring in status epilepticus-When STESS meets APACHE II, SAPS II, and SOFA.
    Semmlack S, Kaplan PW, Spiegel R, De Marchis GM, Hunziker S, Tisljar K, Rüegg S, Marsch S, Sutter R.
    Epilepsia; 2019 Feb; 60(2):189-200. PubMed ID: 30585317
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42. A comparison of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score and the Trauma-Injury Severity Score (TRISS) for outcome assessment in intensive care unit trauma patients.
    Wong DT, Barrow PM, Gomez M, McGuire GP.
    Crit Care Med; 1996 Oct; 24(10):1642-8. PubMed ID: 8874299
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43. Mortality discrimination in acute myocardial infarction: comparison between APACHE III and SAPS II prognosis systems. PAEEC Group.
    Reina A, Vázquez G, Aguayo E, Bravo I, Colmenero M, Bravo M.
    Intensive Care Med; 1997 Mar; 23(3):326-30. PubMed ID: 9083236
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44. Accuracy of a composite score using daily SAPS II and LOD scores for predicting hospital mortality in ICU patients hospitalized for more than 72 h.
    Timsit JF, Fosse JP, Troché G, De Lassence A, Alberti C, Garrouste-Orgeas M, Azoulay E, Chevret S, Moine P, Cohen Y.
    Intensive Care Med; 2001 Jun; 27(6):1012-21. PubMed ID: 11497133
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45. Intensive Care Society's Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) study in Britain and Ireland: a prospective, multicenter, cohort study comparing two methods for predicting outcome for adult intensive care patients.
    Rowan KM, Kerr JH, Major E, McPherson K, Short A, Vessey MP.
    Crit Care Med; 1994 Sep; 22(9):1392-401. PubMed ID: 8062560
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46. Calibration and discrimination by daily Logistic Organ Dysfunction scoring comparatively with daily Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scoring for predicting hospital mortality in critically ill patients.
    Timsit JF, Fosse JP, Troché G, De Lassence A, Alberti C, Garrouste-Orgeas M, Bornstain C, Adrie C, Cheval C, Chevret S, OUTCOMEREA Study Group, France.
    Crit Care Med; 2002 Sep; 30(9):2003-13. PubMed ID: 12352033
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47. The comparison of the efficacy of scoring systems in organophosphate poisoning.
    Bilgin TE, Camdeviren H, Yapici D, Doruk N, Altunkan AA, Altunkan Z, Oral U.
    Toxicol Ind Health; 2005 Sep; 21(7-8):141-6. PubMed ID: 16149728
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48. Scoring systems in cancer patients admitted for an acute complication in a medical intensive care unit.
    Sculier JP, Paesmans M, Markiewicz E, Berghmans T.
    Crit Care Med; 2000 Aug; 28(8):2786-92. PubMed ID: 10966251
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49. The predictive value of four scoring systems in liver transplant recipients.
    Bein T, Fröhlich D, Pömsl J, Forst H, Pratschke E.
    Intensive Care Med; 1995 Jan; 21(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 7560471
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50. Effect of mortality rate on the performance of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II: a simulation study.
    Glance LG, Osler TM, Papadakos P.
    Crit Care Med; 2000 Oct; 28(10):3424-8. PubMed ID: 11057796
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51. Comparison of intensive care outcome prediction models based on admission scores with those based on 24-hour data.
    Duke GJ, Piercy M, DiGiantomasso D, Green JV.
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2008 Nov; 36(6):845-9. PubMed ID: 19115655
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52. Comparison of the accuracy and correctness of mortality estimates for Intensive Care Unit patients in internal clinics of the Czech Republic using APACHE II, APACHE IV, SAPS 3 and MPMoIII models.
    Sedloň P, Kameník L, Škvařil J, Malý M, Táborský M, Zavoral M.
    Med Glas (Zenica); 2016 Aug 01; 13(2):82-9. PubMed ID: 27452324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53. Scoring Systems for Outcome Prediction in a Cardiac Surgical Intensive Care Unit: A Comparative Study.
    Exarchopoulos T, Charitidou E, Dedeilias P, Charitos C, Routsi C.
    Am J Crit Care; 2015 Jul 01; 24(4):327-34; quiz 335. PubMed ID: 26134333
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54. The performance of customised APACHE II and SAPS II in predicting mortality of mixed critically ill patients in a Thai medical intensive care unit.
    Khwannimit B, Bhurayanontachai R.
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2009 Sep 01; 37(5):784-90. PubMed ID: 19775043
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55. Impact of exclusion criteria on case mix, outcome, and length of stay for the severity of disease scoring methods in common use in critical care.
    Wunsch H, Brady AR, Rowan K.
    J Crit Care; 2004 Jun 01; 19(2):67-74. PubMed ID: 15236138
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56. A comparison of the performance of a model based on administrative data and a model based on clinical data: effect of severity of illness on standardized mortality ratios of intensive care units.
    Brinkman S, Abu-Hanna A, van der Veen A, de Jonge E, de Keizer NF.
    Crit Care Med; 2012 Feb 01; 40(2):373-8. PubMed ID: 21983367
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57. Evaluation of illness severity scoring systems and risk prediction in vascular intensive care admissions.
    Dover M, Tawfick W, Hynes N, Sultan S.
    Vascular; 2016 Aug 01; 24(4):390-403. PubMed ID: 26482428
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58. Evaluation of neuro-intensive care unit performance in China: predicting outcomes of Simplified Acute Physiology Score II or Glasgow Coma Scale.
    Zhao XX, Su YY, Wang M, Zhang Y, Ye H, Feng HH, Zhang YZ, Gao DQ, Chen WB.
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2013 Mar 01; 126(6):1132-7. PubMed ID: 23506592
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59. Should the pre-sedation Glasgow Coma Scale value be used when calculating Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation scores for sedated patients? Scottish Intensive Care Society Audit Group.
    Livingston BM, Mackenzie SJ, MacKirdy FN, Howie JC.
    Crit Care Med; 2000 Feb 01; 28(2):389-94. PubMed ID: 10708172
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60. Rating the quality of intensive care units: is it a function of the intensive care unit scoring system?
    Glance LG, Osler TM, Dick A.
    Crit Care Med; 2002 Sep 01; 30(9):1976-82. PubMed ID: 12352029
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.