These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

273 related items for PubMed ID: 10510734

  • 1. Automation of urine sediment examination: a comparison of the Sysmex UF-100 automated flow cytometer with routine manual diagnosis (microscopy, test strips, and bacterial culture).
    Hannemann-Pohl K, Kampf SC.
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 1999 Jul; 37(7):753-64. PubMed ID: 10510734
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Automated urinalysis: first experiences and a comparison between the Iris iQ200 urine microscopy system, the Sysmex UF-100 flow cytometer and manual microscopic particle counting.
    Shayanfar N, Tobler U, von Eckardstein A, Bestmann L.
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2007 Jul; 45(9):1251-6. PubMed ID: 17635081
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Evaluation of Sysmex UF-100 urine flow cytometer vs chamber counting of supravitally stained specimens and conventional bacterial cultures.
    Kouri TT, Kähkönen U, Malminiemi K, Vuento R, Rowan RM.
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1999 Jul; 112(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 10396282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The automation of sediment urinalysis using a new urine flow cytometer (UF-100).
    Fenili D, Pirovano B.
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 1998 Dec; 36(12):909-17. PubMed ID: 9915222
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The standardization of the report for urine cell counting-A converting factor for Sysmex UF-1000i.
    Wang L, Wang H, Zhao C, Chen C.
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2019 May; 33(4):e22857. PubMed ID: 30916401
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Standardized counting of particles in the urine: a comparison between flow cytometry, cell chamber counting and traditional sediment analysis].
    Ottiger C, Regeniter A, Köchli HP, Huber AR.
    Praxis (Bern 1994); 2004 Jan 07; 93(1-2):15-21. PubMed ID: 14964040
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Development of microscopic review criteria by comparison urine flow cytometer, strip and manual microscopic examination.
    Xiang D, Cong Y, Wang C, Yue J, Ma X, Lu Y, Liu P, Ma J.
    Clin Lab; 2012 Jan 07; 58(9-10):979-85. PubMed ID: 23163114
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of the Automated cobas u 701 Urine Microscopy and UF-1000i Flow Cytometry Systems and Manual Microscopy in the Examination of Urine Sediments.
    Lee W, Ha JS, Ryoo NH.
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2016 Sep 07; 30(5):663-71. PubMed ID: 26842372
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Urine analysis performed by flow cytometry: reference range determination and comparison to morphological findings, dipstick chemistry and bacterial culture results--a multicenter study.
    Regeniter A, Haenni V, Risch L, Köchli HP, Colombo JP, Frei R, Huber AR.
    Clin Nephrol; 2001 May 07; 55(5):384-92. PubMed ID: 11393384
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.