These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
160 related items for PubMed ID: 10525816
1. Hepatic CT enhancement: effect of the rate and volume of contrast medium injection in an animal model. Garcia P, Genin G, Bret PM, Bonaldi VM, Reinhold C, Atri M. Abdom Imaging; 1999; 24(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 10525816 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Aortic and hepatic peak enhancement at CT: effect of contrast medium injection rate--pharmacokinetic analysis and experimental porcine model. Bae KT, Heiken JP, Brink JA. Radiology; 1998 Feb; 206(2):455-64. PubMed ID: 9457200 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Factors influencing vascular and hepatic enhancement at CT: experimental study on injection protocol using a canine model. Han JK, Kim AY, Lee KY, Seo JB, Kim TK, Choi BI, Lhee CS, Han MC. J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2000 Feb; 24(3):400-6. PubMed ID: 10864075 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of contrast material for spiral CT of the abdomen: comparison of hepatic enhancement and vascular attenuation for three different contrast media at two different delay times. Herts BR, Paushter DM, Einstein DM, Zepp R, Friedman RA, Obuchowski N. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):327-31. PubMed ID: 7839963 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Peak contrast enhancement in CT and MR angiography: when does it occur and why? Pharmacokinetic study in a porcine model. Bae KT. Radiology; 2003 Jun; 227(3):809-16. PubMed ID: 12702823 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of two contrast materials with different iodine concentrations in enhancing the density of the the aorta, portal vein and liver at multi-detector row CT: a randomized study. Suzuki H, Oshima H, Shiraki N, Ikeya C, Shibamoto Y. Eur Radiol; 2004 Nov; 14(11):2099-104. PubMed ID: 15309493 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Contrast media in abdominal computed tomography: optimization of delivery methods. Han JK, Choi BI, Kim AY, Kim SJ. Korean J Radiol; 2001 Nov; 2(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 11752966 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Contrast material injection for hepatic helical computed tomography. Comparative study of five protocols. Hoeffel C, Legmann P, Girardot C, Bunouf P, Mezzi K, Bonnin A. Invest Radiol; 1996 Aug; 31(8):467-71. PubMed ID: 8854192 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Aortic and hepatic contrast medium enhancement at CT. Part II. Effect of reduced cardiac output in a porcine model. Bae KT, Heiken JP, Brink JA. Radiology; 1998 Jun; 207(3):657-62. PubMed ID: 9609887 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of injection rates of contrast material on arterial phase hepatic CT. Kim T, Murakami T, Takahashi S, Tsuda K, Tomoda K, Narumi Y, Oi H, Nakamura H. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Aug; 171(2):429-32. PubMed ID: 9694469 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Multi-detector row helical CT of the liver: quantitative assessment of iodine concentration of intravenous contrast material on multiphasic CT--a prospective randomized study. Tsurusaki M, Sugimoto K, Fujii M, Sugimura K. Radiat Med; 2004 Aug; 22(4):239-45. PubMed ID: 15468944 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Dynamic CT scanning of the normal canine liver: interpretation of time density curves resulting from an intravenous bolus injection of contrast material. Jaschke W, Lipton MJ, Boyd D, Moss AA, Cann C, Goldberg HI, Margulis AR, Sievers R. Eur J Radiol; 1985 Nov; 5(4):256-60. PubMed ID: 2935396 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. EFFECTS OF TWO CONTRAST INJECTION PROTOCOLS ON FELINE AORTIC AND HEPATIC ENHANCEMENT USING DYNAMIC COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY. Makara M, Chau J, Hall E, Kloeppel H, Podadera J, Barrs V. Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2015 Apr; 56(4):367-73. PubMed ID: 25640846 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]