These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
775 related items for PubMed ID: 10550881
1. The assessment of endometrial pathology and tubal patency: a comparison between the use of ultrasonography and X-ray hysterosalpingography for the investigation of infertility patients. Strandell A, Bourne T, Bergh C, Granberg S, Asztely M, Thorburn J. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Sep; 14(3):200-4. PubMed ID: 10550881 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography compared with hysterosalpingography and laparoscopic dye pertubation to evaluate tubal patency. Exacoustos C, Zupi E, Carusotti C, Lanzi G, Marconi D, Arduini D. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 2003 Aug; 10(3):367-72. PubMed ID: 14567814 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of three-dimensional hysterosalpingo-contrast-sonography and diagnostic laparoscopy with chromopertubation in the assessment of tubal patency for the investigation of subfertility. Chan CC, Ng EH, Tang OS, Chan KK, Ho PC. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Sep; 84(9):909-13. PubMed ID: 16097985 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Sonohysterosalpingography versus hysterosalpingography in the evaluation of uterine and tubal infertility]. Socolov D, Lupaşcu IA, Danciu E, Doroftei B, Boian I, Boiculese L, Pintilie P, Miron N. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2009 Sep; 113(3):803-8. PubMed ID: 20191836 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Confirmation of tubal patency in hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography by transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy. Ahinko-Hakamaa KM, Huhtala H, Tinkanen H. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009 Sep; 88(3):286-90. PubMed ID: 19172423 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Can hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography replace hysterosalpingography in confirming tubal blockage after hysteroscopic sterilization and in the evaluation of the uterus and tubes in infertile patients? Luciano DE, Exacoustos C, Johns DA, Luciano AA. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jan; 204(1):79.e1-5. PubMed ID: 21187197 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of hysterosalpingo-foam sonography in comparison to hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography with air/saline and to laparoscopy with dye. Ludwin I, Ludwin A, Wiechec M, Nocun A, Banas T, Basta P, Pitynski K. Hum Reprod; 2017 Apr 01; 32(4):758-769. PubMed ID: 28184447 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Can hysterosalpingocontrast-sonography replace hysterosalpingography in the assessment of tubal subfertility? Dijkman AB, Mol BW, van der Veen F, Bossuyt PM, Hogerzeil HV. Eur J Radiol; 2000 Jul 01; 35(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 10930765 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Ultrasound in the investigation of tubal patency. A meta-analysis of three comparative studies of Echovist-200 including 1007 women. Holz K, Becker R, Schürmann R. Zentralbl Gynakol; 1997 Jul 01; 119(8):366-73. PubMed ID: 9286072 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography versus radiographic hysterosalpingography in the evaluation of tubal patency. Hamed HO, Shahin AY, Elsamman AM. Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2009 Jun 01; 105(3):215-7. PubMed ID: 19339010 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Contrast ultrasonography for tubal patency. Luciano DE, Exacoustos C, Luciano AA. J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014 Jun 01; 21(6):994-8. PubMed ID: 24910933 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of tubal patency by hysterocontrast sonography (HyCoSy, Echovist) and its correlation with laparoscopic findings. Dietrich M, Suren A, Hinney B, Osmers R, Kuhn W. J Clin Ultrasound; 1996 Jun 01; 24(9):523-7. PubMed ID: 8906485 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Hysterosalpingo-contrast-sonography vs. magnetic resonance-hysterosalpingography for diagnosing fallopian tubal patency: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Chen LS, Zhu ZQ, Li J, Wang ZT, Qiang Y, Hu XY, Zhang MM, Wang ZQ. Eur J Radiol; 2020 Apr 01; 125():108891. PubMed ID: 32088657 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of Fallopian tube patency by HyCoSy: comparison of a positive contrast agent with saline solution. Boudghène FP, Bazot M, Robert Y, Perrot N, Rocourt N, Antoine JM, Morris H, Leroy JL, Uzan S, Bigot JM. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Nov 01; 18(5):525-30. PubMed ID: 11844177 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The sonographic evaluation of tubal patency with stimulated acoustic emission imaging. Prefumo F, Serafini G, Martinoli C, Gandolfo N, Gandolfo NG, Derchi LE. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Oct 01; 20(4):386-9. PubMed ID: 12383323 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Hysterosalpingo contrast sonography (HyCoSy) with SH U 454 (Echovist) for the assessment of tubal patency. Reis MM, Soares SR, Cancado ML, Camargos AF. Hum Reprod; 1998 Nov 01; 13(11):3049-52. PubMed ID: 9853854 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Radiologic versus ultrasound fallopian tube imaging. Painfulness of the examination and diagnostic reliability of hysterosalpingography and hysterosalpingo-contrast-ultrasonography with echovist 200]. Korell M, Seehaus D, Strowitzki T, Hepp H. Ultraschall Med; 1997 Feb 01; 18(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 9173524 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Hysterosalpingography in the assessment of tubal patency]. Kdous M. Tunis Med; 2006 Aug 01; 84(8):520-5. PubMed ID: 17175698 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Hysterosalpingo-contrast-sonography (HyCoSy) in the assessment of tubal patency in endometriosis patients. Moro F, Tropea A, Selvaggi L, Scarinci E, Lanzone A, Apa R. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Mar 01; 186():22-5. PubMed ID: 25597884 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the pain experienced by infertile women undergoing hysterosalpingo contrast sonography or radiographic hysterosalpingography. Socolov D, Boian I, Boiculese L, Tamba B, Anghelache-Lupascu I, Socolov R. Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2010 Dec 01; 111(3):256-9. PubMed ID: 20850745 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]