These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

111 related items for PubMed ID: 10551225

  • 1. Detection of simulated interstitial lung disease and catheters with selenium, storage phosphor, and film-based radiography.
    Bernhardt TM, Otto D, Reichel G, Ludwig K, Seifert S, Kropf S, Rapp-Bernhardt U.
    Radiology; 1999 Nov; 213(2):445-54. PubMed ID: 10551225
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Experimental evaluation of a portable indirect flat-panel detector for the pediatric chest: comparison with storage phosphor radiography at different exposures by using a chest phantom.
    Rapp-Bernhardt U, Bernhardt TM, Lenzen H, Esseling R, Roehl FW, Schiborr M, Theobald-Hormann I, Heindel W.
    Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):485-91. PubMed ID: 16170012
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Selenium radiography versus storage phosphor and conventional radiography in the detection of simulated chest lesions.
    Schaefer-Prokop CM, Prokop M, Schmidt A, Neitzel U, Galanski M.
    Radiology; 1996 Oct; 201(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 8816519
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Low-voltage digital selenium radiography: detection of simulated interstitial lung disease, nodules, and catheters--a phantom study.
    Bernhardt TM, Rapp-Bernhardt U, Lenzen H, Roehl FW, Diederich S, Papke K, Ludwig K, Heindel W.
    Radiology; 2004 Sep; 232(3):693-700. PubMed ID: 15273341
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Flat-panel x-ray detector based on amorphous silicon versus asymmetric screen-film system: phantom study of dose reduction and depiction of simulated findings.
    Rapp-Bernhardt U, Roehl FW, Gibbs RC, Schmidl H, Krause UW, Bernhardt TM.
    Radiology; 2003 May; 227(2):484-92. PubMed ID: 12676965
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography for detection of simulated nodules and interstitial disease in a chest phantom.
    Kroft LJ, Geleijns J, Mertens BJ, Veldkamp WJ, Zonderland HM, de Roos A.
    Radiology; 2004 Apr; 231(1):156-63. PubMed ID: 14990807
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Interpretation of subtle interstitial chest abnormalities: conventional radiography versus high-resolution storage-phosphor radiography--a preliminary study.
    Ikezoe J, Kohno N, Kido S, Takeuchi N, Johkoh T, Arisawa J, Kozuka T.
    J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):31-6. PubMed ID: 7734537
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effects of dose reduction on digital chest imaging using a selenium detector: a study of detecting simulated diffuse interstitial pulmonary disease.
    van Heesewijk HP, van der Graaf Y, de Valois JC, Feldberg MA.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Aug; 167(2):403-8. PubMed ID: 8686616
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Image quality for five modern chest radiography techniques: a modified FROC study with an anthropomorphic chest phantom.
    Månsson LG, Kheddache S, Lanhede B, Tylén U.
    Eur Radiol; 1999 Aug; 9(9):1826-34. PubMed ID: 10602958
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Phantom study of chest radiography with storage phosphor, selenium, and film-screen systems.
    Kehler M, Lyttkens K, Andersson B, Hochbergs P, Lindberg CG, Medin J, Nordström AJ, Sanfridsson J, Vojciechowski J.
    Acta Radiol; 1996 May; 37(3 Pt 1):332-6. PubMed ID: 8845264
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Chest radiography with a digital flat-panel detector: experimental receiver operating characteristic analysis.
    Metz S, Damoser P, Hollweck R, Roggel R, Engelke C, Woertler K, Renger B, Rummeny EJ, Link TM.
    Radiology; 2005 Mar; 234(3):776-84. PubMed ID: 15734933
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Selenium-based digital radiography versus high-resolution storage phosphor radiography in the detection of solitary pulmonary nodules without calcification: receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
    Awai K, Komi M, Hori S.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Nov; 177(5):1141-4. PubMed ID: 11641189
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Digital chest imaging using a selenium detector. A simulated diffuse interstitial pulmonary disease detection study.
    van Heesewijk HP, van der Graaf Y, de Valois JC, Feldberg AM.
    Invest Radiol; 1995 May; 30(5):300-5. PubMed ID: 7558735
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Detection of simulated chest lesions by using soft-copy reading: comparison of an amorphous silicon flat-panel-detector system and a storage-phosphor system.
    Goo JM, Im JG, Lee HJ, Chung MJ, Seo JB, Kim HY, Lee YJ, Kang JW, Kim JH.
    Radiology; 2002 Jul; 224(1):242-6. PubMed ID: 12091690
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of eight different digital chest radiography systems: variation in detection of simulated chest disease.
    Kroft LJ, Veldkamp WJ, Mertens BJ, Boot MV, Geleijns J.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Aug; 185(2):339-46. PubMed ID: 16037503
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.