These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
175 related items for PubMed ID: 10558501
1. My body, my consent: securing the constitutional right to abortion funding. McDonagh EL. Albany Law Rev; 1999; 62(3):1057-1118. PubMed ID: 10558501 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Abortion-rights groups look to 1998. Serafini MW. Natl J (Wash); 1998 Jan 03; 30(1):28-9. PubMed ID: 10176714 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The abortion alternative and the patient's right to know. Shapiro SC. Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1979 Dec 20; (10):5-48. PubMed ID: 10295000 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. High Court overturns Dooling decision ruling Hyde constitutional; HHS discontinues Medicaid financing for abortions. Kaunitz K. Health Law Vigil; 1980 Jul 25; 3(15):3-5. PubMed ID: 10297867 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. State abortion statutes on the eve of the Supreme Court's decision in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey. Terwilliger LM. J Health Hosp Law; 1992 Jun 25; 25(6):161-74. PubMed ID: 10123589 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Constitutionalizing Roe, Casey and Carhart: a legislative due-process anti-discrimination principle that gives constitutional content to the "undue burden" standard of review applied to abortion control legislation. Van Detta JA. South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2001 Jun 25; 10(2):211-92. PubMed ID: 16485363 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Employe must complain to EEOC before feds force abortion payment. Geisel J. Mod Healthc; 1980 Mar 25; 10(3):34. PubMed ID: 10245570 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Air Force women's access to abortion services and the erosion of 10 U.S.C., section 1093. Wilde ML. William Mary J Women Law; 2003 Mar 25; 9(3):351-412. PubMed ID: 15977327 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Contemporary Australian abortion law: the description of a crime and the negation of a woman's right to abortion. Rankin MJ. Monash Univ Law Rev; 2001 Mar 25; 27(2):229-52. PubMed ID: 16493805 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A national voice for women's health concerns. Norinsky M. Health PAC Bull; 1979 Mar 25; 11(2):21-2. PubMed ID: 10247064 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Winter count: taking stock of abortion rights after Casey and Carhart. Borgmann CE. Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar 25; 31(3):675-716. PubMed ID: 16700116 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A taxing tale: unconstitutional conditions and abortion subsidy. Russell MS. Health Matrix Clevel; 1993 Mar 25; 3(2):459-94. PubMed ID: 10133325 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Implications of the Federal Abortion Ban for Women's Health in the United States. Weitz TA, Yanow S. Reprod Health Matters; 2008 May 25; 16(31 Suppl):99-107. PubMed ID: 18772090 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The economics of abortion access in the US: restrictions on government funding for abortion is the post-Roe battleground. Fried MG. Conscience; 2008 May 25; 26(4):11-5. PubMed ID: 16619422 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Consent and marital status--the legalities. Rozovsky LE, Rozovsky FA. Can Oper Room Nurs J; 1986 Jun 25; 4(3):19-20. PubMed ID: 3639758 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Abortion 1992: the boundaries of regulation. Healey JM. Conn Med; 1992 Sep 25; 56(9):503. PubMed ID: 1424615 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Abortion and the sovereignty of the people. Dunn K. Health Matrix; 1989 Sep 25; 7(2):53-5. PubMed ID: 10294683 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Taking the sting out of reporting requirements: reproductive health clinics and the constitutional right to informational privacy. Bodger JA. Duke Law J; 2006 Nov 25; 56(2):583-609. PubMed ID: 17302004 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]