These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


190 related items for PubMed ID: 10560593

  • 21. Use of the likelihood ratio in the management of the young child with fever.
    Pascoe JM.
    J Fam Pract; 1986 Apr; 22(4):349-52. PubMed ID: 3958681
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. [Evaluation of the diagnostic value of a test. Main information indices].
    Landais P, Besson C, Jais JP.
    J Radiol; 1995 Apr; 76(2-3):I-X. PubMed ID: 7714857
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Bayesian analysis of electrocardiographic exercise stress testing.
    Rifkin RD, Hood WB.
    N Engl J Med; 1977 Sep 29; 297(13):681-6. PubMed ID: 895788
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. The usefulness of the likelihood ratio in the diagnosis of dyspepsia and gastroesophageal reflux disease.
    Moayyedi P, Axon AT.
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1999 Nov 29; 94(11):3122-5. PubMed ID: 10566701
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. New concepts and methods of standardizing predictive value, accuracy and incorrect diagnostic rate.
    Shen H, Chen Q.
    Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 2000 Feb 29; 22(1):76-9. PubMed ID: 10696464
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Intervals for posttest probabilities: a comparison of 5 methods.
    Mossman D, Berger JO.
    Med Decis Making; 2001 Feb 29; 21(6):498-507. PubMed ID: 11760107
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. A Bayesian approach to toxicological testing.
    Felli JC, Leishman DJ.
    J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2020 Sep 29; 105():106898. PubMed ID: 32735877
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. A critique on contemporary reporting of likelihood ratios in test power analysis.
    Weissler AM, Bailey KR.
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2004 Oct 29; 79(10):1317-8. PubMed ID: 15473417
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Information provided by diagnostic and screening tests: improving probabilities.
    Weatherall M.
    Postgrad Med J; 2018 Apr 29; 94(1110):230-235. PubMed ID: 29133377
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. 'Likelihood-ratio' and 'odds' applied to monitoring of patients as a supplement to 'reference change value' (RCV).
    Petersen PH, Sandberg S, Iglesias N, Sölétormos G, Aarsand AK, Brandslund I, Jørgensen LG.
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2008 Apr 29; 46(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 18076354
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Estimating negative likelihood ratio confidence when test sensitivity is 100%: A bootstrapping approach.
    Marill KA, Chang Y, Wong KF, Friedman AB.
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Aug 29; 26(4):1936-1948. PubMed ID: 26152746
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Likelihood ratios: clinical application in day-to-day practice.
    Parikh R, Parikh S, Arun E, Thomas R.
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2009 Aug 29; 57(3):217-21. PubMed ID: 19384017
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. [Clinical use of diagnostic tests (Part 2). Clinical application and usefulness of a diagnostic test].
    Cifuentes L, Cerda J.
    Rev Chilena Infectol; 2010 Aug 29; 27(4):316-9. PubMed ID: 21046715
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.