These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
144 related items for PubMed ID: 10564627
1. Tailored risk notification for women with a family history of breast cancer. Bastani R, Maxwell AE, Bradford C, Das IP, Yan KX. Prev Med; 1999 Nov; 29(5):355-64. PubMed ID: 10564627 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Healthy women with a family history of breast cancer: impact of a tailored genetic counseling intervention on risk perception, knowledge, and menopausal therapy decision making. Matloff ET, Moyer A, Shannon KM, Niendorf KB, Col NF. J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2006 Sep; 15(7):843-56. PubMed ID: 16999640 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Breast cancer worry and mammography use by women with and without a family history in a population-based sample. Andersen MR, Smith R, Meischke H, Bowen D, Urban N. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2003 Apr; 12(4):314-20. PubMed ID: 12692105 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Family history of breast cancer and compliance with mammography in Israel: findings of the National Health Survey 2003-2004 (EUROHIS). Keinan-Boker L, Baron-Epel O, Garty N, Green MS. Eur J Cancer Prev; 2007 Feb; 16(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 17220703 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Timing of familial breast cancer in sisters. Rebora P, Czene K, Reilly M. J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May 21; 100(10):721-7. PubMed ID: 18477799 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Screening and prevention of breast cancer in primary care. Tice JA, Kerlikowske K. Prim Care; 2009 Sep 21; 36(3):533-58. PubMed ID: 19616154 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The 2003 Australian Breast Health Survey: survey design and preliminary results. Villanueva EV, Jones S, Nehill C, Favelle S, Steel D, Iverson D, Zorbas H. BMC Public Health; 2008 Jan 14; 8():13. PubMed ID: 18194528 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Risk assessment of first-degree relatives of women with breast cancer: a feasibility study. Hurt GJ, McQuellon RP, Michielutte R, Conrad DM, Carter S, Anderson H. Oncol Nurs Forum; 2001 Aug 14; 28(7):1097-104. PubMed ID: 11517843 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Breast carcinoma screening and risk perception among women at increased risk for breast carcinoma: results from a national survey. Sabatino SA, Burns RB, Davis RB, Phillips RS, Chen YH, McCarthy EP. Cancer; 2004 Jun 01; 100(11):2338-46. PubMed ID: 15160336 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A randomized intervention to improve ongoing participation in mammography. Barr JK, Franks AL, Lee NC, Antonucci DM, Rifkind S, Schachter M. Am J Manag Care; 2001 Sep 01; 7(9):887-94. PubMed ID: 11570022 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Increasing mammography among women aged 40-74 by use of a stage-matched, tailored intervention. Rakowski W, Ehrich B, Goldstein MG, Rimer BK, Pearlman DN, Clark MA, Velicer WF, Woolverton H. Prev Med; 1998 Sep 01; 27(5 Pt 1):748-56. PubMed ID: 9808807 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Another round in the mammography controversy. Meissner HI, Rimer BK, Davis WW, Eisner EJ, Siegler IC. J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2003 Apr 01; 12(3):261-76. PubMed ID: 12804357 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Recruiting high risk women into a breast cancer health promotion trial. Lerman C, Rimer BK, Daly M, Lustbader E, Sands C, Balshem A, Masny A, Engstrom P. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1994 Apr 01; 3(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 8019378 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]