These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

916 related items for PubMed ID: 10570589

  • 21. A clinical comparison of glass ionomer, resin-modified glass ionomer and resin composite restorations in the treatment of cervical caries in xerostomic head and neck radiation patients.
    McComb D, Erickson RL, Maxymiw WG, Wood RE.
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 12216559
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. In vitro caries inhibition effects by conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations.
    Tam LE, Chan GP, Yim D.
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(1):4-14. PubMed ID: 9227122
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Secondary caries formation in vitro around glass ionomer-lined amalgam and composite restorations.
    Dionysopoulos P, Kotsanos N, Papadogianis Y.
    J Oral Rehabil; 1996 Aug; 23(8):511-9. PubMed ID: 8866262
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. The in vitro effect of glass-ionomer cement restoration on enamel subjected to a demineralization and remineralization model.
    Serra MC, Cury JA.
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Feb; 23(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 1641453
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Vitremer restorative cement for children: three clinicians' observations in three pediatric dental practices.
    Croll TP, Helpin ML, Donly KJ.
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2000 Feb; 67(6):391-8, 374. PubMed ID: 11204061
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Glass-ionomer cement restorations and secondary caries: a preliminary report.
    Mjör IA.
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Mar; 27(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 9063229
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Comparison of antibacterial activity of glass-ionomer cement and amalgam in class two restorations by Streptococcus mutans count analysis at fixed intervals: an in vivo study.
    Tegginmani VS, Goel B, Uppin V, Horatti P, Kumar LS, Nainani A.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 May 01; 14(3):381-6. PubMed ID: 24171977
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Eight-year study on conventional glass ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth.
    Qvist V, Laurberg L, Poulsen A, Teglers PT.
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2004 Feb 01; 62(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 15124781
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Demineralization around orthodontic brackets bonded with resin-modified glass ionomer cement and fluoride-releasing resin composite.
    Wilson RM, Donly KJ.
    Pediatr Dent; 2001 Feb 01; 23(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 11447960
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Secondary caries formation with a two-species biofilm artificial mouth.
    Amend S, Frankenberger R, Lücker S, Domann E, Krämer N.
    Dent Mater; 2018 May 01; 34(5):786-796. PubMed ID: 29544984
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. A clinical evaluation of resin-based composite and glass ionomer cement restorations placed in primary teeth using the ART approach: results at 24 months.
    Ersin NK, Candan U, Aykut A, Onçağ O, Eronat C, Kose T.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2006 Nov 01; 137(11):1529-36. PubMed ID: 17082278
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in primary molars.
    Folkesson UH, Andersson-Wenckert IE, van Dijken JW.
    Swed Dent J; 1999 Nov 01; 23(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 10371000
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Artificially formed caries-like lesions around Class II glass ionomer restorations in primary molars.
    Sepet E, Aytepe Z, Guven Y.
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1995 Nov 01; 20(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 8634193
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Three restorative materials and topical fluoride gel used in xerostomic patients: a clinical comparison.
    Haveman CW, Summitt JB, Burgess JO, Carlson K.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2003 Feb 01; 134(2):177-84. PubMed ID: 12636121
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition.
    Yengopal V, Harneker SY, Patel N, Siegfried N.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Apr 15; (2):CD004483. PubMed ID: 19370602
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. In vivo cariostatic effect of resin modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam on dentine.
    Kreulen CM, de Soet JJ, Weerheijm KL, van Amerongen WE.
    Caries Res; 1997 Apr 15; 31(5):384-9. PubMed ID: 9286523
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Streptococcus mutans-induced secondary caries adjacent to glass ionomer cement, composite resin and amalgam restorations in vitro.
    Gama-Teixeira A, Simionato MR, Elian SN, Sobral MA, Luz MA.
    Braz Oral Res; 2007 Apr 15; 21(4):368-74. PubMed ID: 18060266
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Class II restorations in primary teeth: 7-year study on three resin-modified glass ionomer cements and a compomer.
    Qvist V, Laurberg L, Poulsen A, Teglers PT.
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2004 Apr 15; 112(2):188-96. PubMed ID: 15056118
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Clinicians' choices of restorative materials for children.
    Tran LA, Messer LB.
    Aust Dent J; 2003 Dec 15; 48(4):221-32. PubMed ID: 14738124
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Reliability of different techniques to assess marginal defects of Class II restorations in retrieved primary molars: a visual-tactile, SEM, dye penetration and polarized light microscopy study.
    Fuks AB, Araujo FB, Donly KJ, Cervantes M.
    Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2002 Oct 15; 19(4):6-16, 67. PubMed ID: 12510251
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 46.