These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

152 related items for PubMed ID: 10575110

  • 21. Distortion product otoacoustic emission contralateral suppression functions obtained with ramped stimuli.
    Purcell DW, Butler BE, Saunders TJ, Allen P.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2133-48. PubMed ID: 19062854
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Suppression tuning of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in the barn owl (Tyto alba).
    Engler S, Köppl C, Manley GA, de Kleine E, van Dijk P.
    Hear Res; 2020 Jan; 385():107835. PubMed ID: 31710933
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Influence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAE) on acoustic distortion product input/output functions: does the medial efferent system act differently in the vicinity of an SOAE?
    Moulin A, Collet L, Morgon A.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1992 Jan; 112(2):210-4. PubMed ID: 1604981
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Effect of contralateral masking on the latency of otoacoustic emissions elicited by acoustic distortion products.
    Silva A, Ysunza A.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 1998 Jul 10; 44(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 9725528
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Influence of contralateral stimulation by two-tone complexes, narrow-band and broad-band noise signals on the 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission levels in humans.
    Lisowska G, Smurzynski J, Morawski K, Namyslowski G, Probst R.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2002 Sep 10; 122(6):613-9. PubMed ID: 12403123
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Contralateral acoustic stimulation modulates low-frequency biasing of DPOAE: efferent influence on cochlear amplifier operating state?
    Abel C, Wittekindt A, Kössl M.
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 May 10; 101(5):2362-71. PubMed ID: 19279155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Olivocochlear efferent vs. middle-ear contributions to the alteration of otoacoustic emissions by contralateral noise.
    Büki B, Wit HP, Avan P.
    Brain Res; 2000 Jan 03; 852(1):140-50. PubMed ID: 10661505
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Suppression and enhancement of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions by interference tones above f(2). II. Findings in humans.
    Martin GK, Villasuso EI, Stagner BB, Lonsbury-Martin BL.
    Hear Res; 2003 Mar 03; 177(1-2):111-22. PubMed ID: 12618323
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Test-retest repeatability of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Wagner W, Heppelmann G, Vonthein R, Zenner HP.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun 03; 29(3):378-91. PubMed ID: 18382378
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Rapid adaptation of the 2f1-f2 DPOAE in humans: binaural and contralateral stimulation effects.
    Bassim MK, Miller RL, Buss E, Smith DW.
    Hear Res; 2003 Aug 03; 182(1-2):140-52. PubMed ID: 12948609
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Repeatability of high-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adults.
    Dreisbach LE, Long KM, Lees SE.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct 03; 27(5):466-79. PubMed ID: 16957498
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions created through the interaction of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and externally generated tones.
    Norrix LW, Glattke TJ.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Aug 03; 100(2 Pt 1):945-55. PubMed ID: 8759948
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Effects of contralateral acoustic stimulation on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.
    Harrison WA, Burns EM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Nov 03; 94(5):2649-58. PubMed ID: 8270741
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. [A study on the contralateral suppressive effects of distortion product otoacoustic emissions].
    Wang H, Zhong N.
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1997 Nov 03; 11(11):489-92. PubMed ID: 10323015
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. The Effect of Contralateral Pure Tones on the Compound Action Potential in Humans: Efferent Tuning Curves.
    Najem F, Ferraro J, Chertoff M.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Feb 03; 27(2):103-16. PubMed ID: 26905530
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. [Effect of inner ear hearing loss on delayed otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion products (DPOAE)].
    Hoth S.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Dec 03; 75(12):709-18. PubMed ID: 9081275
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Evidence for a bipolar change in distortion product otoacoustic emissions during contralateral acoustic stimulation in humans.
    Müller J, Janssen T, Heppelmann G, Wagner W.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Dec 03; 118(6):3747-56. PubMed ID: 16419819
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. [Effect of contralateral noise exposure on otoacoustic distortion product emissions in man].
    Richter B, Hauser R, Löhle E.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1995 Mar 03; 74(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 7755853
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. II. Interrelations between multicomponent DPOAEs, tone-burst-evoked OAEs, and spontaneous OAEs.
    Moulin A.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar 03; 107(3):1471-86. PubMed ID: 10738802
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. [Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and efferent control of cochlea].
    Xu J, Liu C, Guo L, Lian N, Liu B.
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Dec 03; 36(6):436-40. PubMed ID: 12761959
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.