These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

52 related items for PubMed ID: 10596596

  • 1. [On the modeling of acoustic perception in patients with implants].
    Lantsov AA, Petrov SM, Pudov VI.
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1999; (6):21-3. PubMed ID: 10596596
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Speech perception learning in patients with cochlear implants].
    Petrov SM.
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2005; (3):34-6. PubMed ID: 16034344
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Grantham DW, Ashmead DH, Ricketts TA, Labadie RF, Haynes DS.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):524-41. PubMed ID: 17609614
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.
    James CJ, Skinner MW, Martin LF, Holden LK, Galvin KL, Holden TA, Whitford L.
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Tone perception of Cantonese-speaking prelingually hearing-impaired children with cochlear implants.
    Wong AO, Wong LL.
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 Jun; 130(6):751-8. PubMed ID: 15195063
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Galvin KL, Mok M, Dowell RC.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [The characteristics of hearing perception in light of the problem of rehabilitating patients who have undergone implantation].
    Lantsov AA, Petrov SM, Pudov VI.
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1998 Aug; (4):9-11. PubMed ID: 9752087
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The influence of residual high-frequency hearing on the outcome in congenitally deaf cochlear implant recipients.
    Kuo SC, Gibson WP.
    Am J Otol; 2000 Sep; 21(5):657-62. PubMed ID: 10993454
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Is psychological status a determinant of speech perception outcomes in highly selected good adolescent cochlear implant users?
    Yucel E, Sennaroglu G.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Sep; 71(9):1415-22. PubMed ID: 17586056
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Speech, language, and reading skills after early cochlear implantation.
    Geers AE.
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 May; 130(5):634-8. PubMed ID: 15148189
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Cochlear implantation with implant Combi 40+ produced by MED-El].
    Ovchinnikov IuM, Borodin AA.
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2001 May; (1):33-6. PubMed ID: 11247244
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Objective methods of fitting speech processors of cochlear implants Combi-40/40+ and Tempo+: impedance technique].
    Petrov SM, Shchukina AA.
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2007 May; (5):20-2. PubMed ID: 18163073
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effects of cytomegalovirus (CMV) related deafness on pediatric cochlear implant outcomes.
    Lee DJ, Lustig L, Sampson M, Chinnici J, Niparko JK.
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2005 Dec; 133(6):900-5. PubMed ID: 16360511
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
    Novak MA, Black JM, Koch DB.
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A novel speech-processing strategy incorporating tonal information for cochlear implants.
    Lan N, Nie KB, Gao SK, Zeng FG.
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 May; 51(5):752-60. PubMed ID: 15132501
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Developments in speech processing for cochlear implants.
    Wouters J, Geurts L, Peeters S, Vanden Berghe J, van Wieringen A.
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1998 May; 52(2):129-32. PubMed ID: 9651613
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Implication of central asymmetry in speech processing on selecting the ear for cochlear implantation.
    Morris LG, Mallur PS, Roland JT, Waltzman SB, Lalwani AK.
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Jan; 28(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 17195742
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Tone discrimination and speech perception benefit in Mandarin-speaking children fit with HiRes fidelity 120 sound processing.
    Chang YT, Yang HM, Lin YH, Liu SH, Wu JL.
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):750-7. PubMed ID: 19704359
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The development of speech perception in children using cochlear implants: effects of etiologic factors and delayed milestones.
    Pyman B, Blamey P, Lacy P, Clark G, Dowell R.
    Am J Otol; 2000 Jan; 21(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 10651436
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD, Veraguth D, Dillier N, Binkert A, Holzmann D, Huber AM.
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 3.