These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

200 related items for PubMed ID: 10597152

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Profilometric and standard error of the mean analysis of rough implant surfaces treated with different instrumentations.
    Ramaglia L, di Lauro AE, Morgese F, Squillace A.
    Implant Dent; 2006 Mar; 15(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 16569965
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A comparative study of the effects of metallic, nonmetallic, and sonic instrumentation on titanium abutment surfaces.
    Hallmon WW, Waldrop TC, Meffert RM, Wade BW.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996 Mar; 11(1):96-100. PubMed ID: 8820128
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The comparative effect of ultrasonic scalers on titanium surfaces: an in vitro study.
    Sato S, Kishida M, Ito K.
    J Periodontol; 2004 Sep; 75(9):1269-73. PubMed ID: 15515344
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effect of plastic-covered ultrasonic scalers on titanium implant surfaces.
    Mann M, Parmar D, Walmsley AD, Lea SC.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jan; 23(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 21488970
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The treatment of uncoated and titanium nitride-coated abutments with different instruments.
    Mengel R, Meer C, Flores-de-Jacoby L.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004 Jan; 19(2):232-8. PubMed ID: 15101595
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. An in vitro study of the treatment of implant surfaces with different instruments.
    Mengel R, Buns CE, Mengel C, Flores-de-Jacoby L.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998 Jan; 13(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 9509785
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Histomorphometric and fluorescence microscopic evaluation of interfacial bone healing around 3 different dental implants before and after radiation therapy.
    Weinlaender M, Beumer J, Kenney EB, Lekovic V, Holmes R, Moy PK, Plenk H.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006 Jan; 21(2):212-24. PubMed ID: 16634491
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Bone cell attachment to dental implants of different surface characteristics.
    Lumbikanonda N, Sammons R.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001 Jan; 16(5):627-36. PubMed ID: 11669244
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The surface characteristics produced by various oral hygiene instruments and materials on titanium implant abutments.
    Rapley JW, Swan RH, Hallmon WW, Mills MP.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1990 Jan; 5(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 2202669
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Effects of ultrasonic scaler tips and toothbrush on titanium disc surfaces evaluated with confocal microscopy.
    Park JB, Kim N, Ko Y.
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 23(5):1552-8. PubMed ID: 22976659
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Treatment of titanium dental implants with three piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers: an in vivo study.
    Kawashima H, Sato S, Kishida M, Yagi H, Matsumoto K, Ito K.
    J Periodontol; 2007 Sep; 78(9):1689-94. PubMed ID: 17760537
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The qualitative effects of various types of hygiene instrumentation on commercially pure titanium and titanium alloy implant abutments: an in vitro and scanning electron microscope study.
    Brookshire FV, Nagy WW, Dhuru VB, Ziebert GJ, Chada S.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Sep; 78(3):286-94. PubMed ID: 9297646
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Surface characterization of dental implants coated with hydroxyapatite by plasma spray and biomimetic process.
    Vidigal GM, Groisman M, de Sena LA, Soares Gde A.
    Implant Dent; 2009 Aug; 18(4):353-61. PubMed ID: 19667824
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. An in vitro evaluation of zirconia surface roughness caused by different scaling methods.
    Vigolo P, Motterle M.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 May; 103(5):283-7. PubMed ID: 20416411
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.