These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
125 related items for PubMed ID: 10597512
1. A normalized identity-by-state statistic for linkage analysis of sib pairs. Nemesure BB, He Q, Mendell NR. Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 17 Suppl 1():S673-7. PubMed ID: 10597512 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Nonparametric simulation-based statistics for detecting linkage in general pedigrees. Davis S, Schroeder M, Goldin LR, Weeks DE. Am J Hum Genet; 1996 Apr; 58(4):867-80. PubMed ID: 8644751 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The triangle test statistic (TTS): a test of genetic homogeneity using departure from the triangle constraints in IBD distribution among affected sib-pairs. Dizier MH, Quesneville H, Prum B, Selinger-Leneman H, Clerget-Darpoux F. Ann Hum Genet; 2000 Sep; 64(Pt 5):433-42. PubMed ID: 11281281 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A joint test of linkage and gene x environment interaction, with affected sib pairs. Gauderman WJ, Morrison JL, Siegmund KD, Thomas DC. Genet Epidemiol; 1999 Sep; 17 Suppl 1():S563-8. PubMed ID: 10597493 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A generalized estimating equations approach to linkage analysis in sibships in relation to multiple markers and exposure factors. Thomas DC, Qian D, Gauderman WJ, Siegmund K, Morrison JL. Genet Epidemiol; 1999 Sep; 17 Suppl 1():S737-42. PubMed ID: 10597523 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Affected sib pair identity by state analyses. Thomson G, Motro U. Genet Epidemiol; 1994 Sep; 11(4):353-64. PubMed ID: 7813897 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Departure from the triangle constraints in discordant sib pairs: a test for genetic heterogeneity. Quesneville H, Dizier MH, Clerget-Darpoux F. Genet Epidemiol; 1999 Sep; 17 Suppl 1():S685-9. PubMed ID: 10597514 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Association tests using unaffected-sibling versus pseudo-sibling controls. Siegmund KD, Gauderman WJ, Thomas DC. Genet Epidemiol; 1999 Sep; 17 Suppl 1():S731-6. PubMed ID: 10597522 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Consanguinity and the sib-pair method: an approach using identity by descent between and within individuals. Génin E, Clerget-Darpoux F. Am J Hum Genet; 1996 Nov; 59(5):1149-62. PubMed ID: 8900245 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of some allele-sharing based linkage analysis methods for detecting complex trait loci. Liu Y, Mirea L, Pinnaduwage D, Fallah S, Tritchler D. Genet Epidemiol; 1999 Nov; 17 Suppl 1():S639-42. PubMed ID: 10597506 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A test statistic to detect errors in sib-pair relationships. Ehm M, Wagner M. Am J Hum Genet; 1998 Jan; 62(1):181-8. PubMed ID: 9443861 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Regression models for allele sharing: analysis of accumulating data in affected sib pair studies. Bull SB, Greenwood CM, Mirea L, Morgan K. Stat Med; 2002 Feb 15; 21(3):431-44. PubMed ID: 11813229 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Statistical tests for detection of misspecified relationships by use of genome-screen data. McPeek MS, Sun L. Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Mar 15; 66(3):1076-94. PubMed ID: 10712219 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]