These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

154 related items for PubMed ID: 10603189

  • 1. Detection of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and tumors using the AutoPap System: results of a primary screening clinical trial.
    Wilbur DC, Prey MU, Miller WM, Pawlick GF, Colgan TJ, Dax Taylor D.
    Cancer; 1999 Dec 25; 87(6):354-8. PubMed ID: 10603189
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The AutoPap system for primary screening in cervical cytology. Comparing the results of a prospective, intended-use study with routine manual practice.
    Wilbur DC, Prey MU, Miller WM, Pawlick GF, Colgan TJ.
    Acta Cytol; 1998 Dec 25; 42(1):214-20. PubMed ID: 9479343
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The AutoPap 300 QC System multicenter clinical trials for use in quality control rescreening of cervical smears: II. Prospective and archival sensitivity studies.
    Patten SF, Lee JS, Wilbur DC, Bonfiglio TA, Colgan TJ, Richart RM, Cramer H, Moinuddin S.
    Cancer; 1997 Dec 25; 81(6):343-7. PubMed ID: 9438459
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The AutoPap 300 QC System multicenter clinical trials for use in quality control rescreening of cervical smears: I. A prospective intended use study.
    Patten SF, Lee JS, Wilbur DC, Bonfiglio TA, Colgan TJ, Richart RM, Cramer H, Moinuddin S.
    Cancer; 1997 Dec 25; 81(6):337-42. PubMed ID: 9438458
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Validation of AutoPap primary screening system sensitivity and high-risk performance.
    Tench WD.
    Acta Cytol; 2002 Dec 25; 46(2):296-302. PubMed ID: 11917576
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparative sensitivities of ThinPrep and Papanicolaou smear for adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) and combined AIS/high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL): comparison with HSIL.
    Roberts JM, Thurloe JK.
    Cancer; 2007 Dec 25; 111(6):482-6. PubMed ID: 17969065
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Performance of Aptima and Cobas HPV testing platforms in detecting high-grade cervical dysplasia and cancer.
    Ge Y, Christensen P, Luna E, Armylagos D, Schwartz MR, Mody DR.
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2017 Aug 25; 125(8):652-657. PubMed ID: 28574670
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Does use of the AutoPap assisted primary screener improve cytologic diagnosis?
    Bibbo M, Hawthorne C, Zimmerman B.
    Acta Cytol; 1999 Aug 25; 43(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 9987445
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Nationwide Rereview of Normal Cervical Cytologies before High-Grade Cervical Lesions or before Invasive Cervical Cancer.
    Edvardsson H, Wang J, Andrae B, Sparén P, Strander B, Dillner J.
    Acta Cytol; 2021 Aug 25; 65(5):377-384. PubMed ID: 34077926
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Improved quality-control detection of false-negative Pap smears using the Autopap 300 QC system.
    Marshall CJ, Rowe L, Bentz JS.
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1999 Mar 25; 20(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 10086244
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Atypical endocervical glandular cells: accuracy of cytologic diagnosis.
    Lee KR, Manna EA, St John T.
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1995 Oct 25; 13(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 8575278
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Rescreening of high-risk HPV positive Papanicolaou tests initially screened as negative is a low yield procedure in the era of HPV genotyping.
    Narkcham S, Mody DR, Jones A, Thrall MJ.
    J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2021 Oct 25; 10(6):558-564. PubMed ID: 34103275
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Clinical importance of "low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL-H)" terminology for cervical smears 5-year analysis of the positive predictive value of LSIL-H compared with ASC-H, LSIL, and HSIL in the detection of high-grade cervical lesions with a review of the literature.
    Ince U, Aydin O, Peker O.
    Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Apr 25; 121(1):152-6. PubMed ID: 21211831
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.