These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

118 related items for PubMed ID: 10615456

  • 21. Binocular lens tilt and decentration measurements in healthy subjects with phakic eyes.
    Schaeffel F.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 May; 49(5):2216-22. PubMed ID: 18436854
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. The extended horopter: quantifying retinal correspondence across changes of 3D eye position.
    Schreiber KM, Tweed DB, Schor CM.
    J Vis; 2006 Jan 25; 6(1):64-74. PubMed ID: 16489859
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Perception of relative depth interval: systematic biases in perceived depth.
    Harris JM, Chopin A, Zeiner K, Hibbard PB.
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012 Jan 25; 65(1):73-91. PubMed ID: 21923632
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Are corresponding points fixed?
    Hillis JM, Banks MS.
    Vision Res; 2001 Sep 25; 41(19):2457-73. PubMed ID: 11483177
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Does depth perception require vertical-disparity detectors?
    Read JC, Cumming BG.
    J Vis; 2006 Nov 20; 6(12):1323-55. PubMed ID: 17209738
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Aging does not affect the accuracy of vertical saccades nor the quality of their binocular coordination: a study of a special elderly group.
    Yang Q, Kapoula Z.
    Neurobiol Aging; 2008 Apr 20; 29(4):622-38. PubMed ID: 17157416
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Fixation disparity: binocular vergence accuracy for a visual display at different positions relative to the eyes.
    Jainta S, Jaschinski W.
    Hum Factors; 2002 Apr 20; 44(3):443-50. PubMed ID: 12502161
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Horizontal/vertical differences in range and upper/lower visual field differences in the midpoints of sensory fusion limits of oriented lines.
    Grove PM, Ono H.
    Perception; 2012 Apr 20; 41(8):939-49. PubMed ID: 23362671
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Adaptive control of vergence in humans.
    Schor CM, Maxwell JS, McCandless J, Graf E.
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2002 Apr 20; 956():297-305. PubMed ID: 11960813
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Vergence eye movements elicited by stimuli without corresponding features.
    Liu L, Stevenson SB, Schor CM.
    Perception; 1998 Apr 20; 27(1):7-20. PubMed ID: 9692085
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Capture of visual direction in dynamic vergence is reduced with flashed monocular lines.
    Jaschinski W, Jainta S, Schürer M.
    Vision Res; 2006 Aug 20; 46(16):2608-14. PubMed ID: 16530245
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Vergence responses to vertical binocular disparity during lexical identification.
    Nikolova M, Jainta S, Blythe HI, Jones MO, Liversedge SP.
    Vision Res; 2015 Jan 20; 106():27-35. PubMed ID: 25433156
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Horizontal and vertical disparity, eye position, and stereoscopic slant perception.
    Backus BT, Banks MS, van Ee R, Crowell JA.
    Vision Res; 1999 Mar 20; 39(6):1143-70. PubMed ID: 10343832
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.