These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

106 related items for PubMed ID: 10615543

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Port catheter insufficiency: incidence and clinical-radiological correlations.
    Surov A, Jordan K, Buerke M, Arnold D, John E, Spielmann RP, Behrmann C.
    Onkologie; 2008 Sep; 31(8-9):455-61. PubMed ID: 18787353
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. [Experiences with 3151 central venous catheters at a surgical clinic].
    Lehr L, Brandmair W, Kovacs J, von Sommoggy S.
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1988 Aug 05; 113(31-32):1218-23. PubMed ID: 3402341
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. External jugular Groshong catheter is associated with fewer complications than a subclavian Argyle catheter.
    Ishizuka M, Nagata H, Takagi K, Horie T, Furihata M, Nakagawa A, Kubota K.
    Eur Surg Res; 2008 Aug 05; 40(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 17998779
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Low infection rate and long durability of nontunneled silastic catheters. A safe and cost-effective alternative for long-term venous access.
    Raad I, Davis S, Becker M, Hohn D, Houston D, Umphrey J, Bodey GP.
    Arch Intern Med; 1993 Aug 09; 153(15):1791-6. PubMed ID: 8392831
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Supraclavicular approach is an easy and safe method of subclavian vein catheterization even in mechanically ventilated patients: analysis of 370 attempts.
    Czarnik T, Gawda R, Perkowski T, Weron R.
    Anesthesiology; 2009 Aug 09; 111(2):334-9. PubMed ID: 19602954
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Evaluation of catheter loops in central venous port systems.
    Behrendt FF, Wingen M, Katoh M, Guenther RW, Buecker A.
    Invest Radiol; 2006 Nov 09; 41(11):777-80. PubMed ID: 17035867
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Risk of thrombosis and infections of central venous catheters and totally implanted access ports in patients treated for cancer.
    Beckers MM, Ruven HJ, Seldenrijk CA, Prins MH, Biesma DH.
    Thromb Res; 2010 Apr 09; 125(4):318-21. PubMed ID: 19640573
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. [Catheter fracture and pulmonary embolization of the distal fragment: a rare complication of the totally implantable venous access port].
    Rebahi H, El Adib AG, Mouaffak Y, El Hattaoui M, Chaara A, Sadek H, Khouchani M, Mahmal L, Younous S.
    Rev Med Interne; 2015 Jan 09; 36(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 24050786
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. An additional imaging sign preceding spontaneous fragmentation and embolization of an implanted subclavian vein catheter.
    Abulafia O, Sherer DM, Fultz PJ.
    Am J Crit Care; 1995 Jul 09; 4(4):322-4. PubMed ID: 7663598
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. The mechanisms of positional dysfunction of subclavian venous catheters.
    Krutchen AE, Bjarnason H, Stackhouse DJ, Nazarian GK, Magney JE, Hunter DW.
    Radiology; 1996 Jul 09; 200(1):159-63. PubMed ID: 8657904
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.